|  | €uromeinke, FEJ. and Ghoulish Delight RULE!!! NA abides. | 
|  | 
|  02-04-2011, 05:41 PM | #1 | |
| Kicking up my heels! Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: The Silver State 
					Posts: 3,783
				            | Quote: 
 Clearly they don't want to benefit anyone so much as punish people who they don't like. 
				__________________ Nee Stell Thue | |
|   | Submit to Quotes   | 
|  02-04-2011, 07:58 PM | #2 | 
| Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2005 
					Posts: 4,978
				            | Surprising how often this philosophy seems to show up. Kind of sad, really.  
				__________________ Why cycling? Anything [sport] that had to do with a ball, I wasn't very good at. -Lance Armstrong | 
|   | Submit to Quotes   | 
|  02-04-2011, 05:42 PM | #3 | |
| Kicking up my heels! Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: The Silver State 
					Posts: 3,783
				            | Quote: 
 Clearly they don't want to benefit anyone so much as punish people who they don't like. 
				__________________ Nee Stell Thue | |
|   | Submit to Quotes   | 
|  02-03-2011, 04:15 PM | #4 | 
| Chowder Head Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Yes 
					Posts: 18,500
				            | Here's a question I have been meaning to ask. It has probably been covered ad naseum on the interwebs, but I am too lazy to look. Why do the terms 'homosexual' and 'gay' predominantly refer to males since (unless I am mistaken) they are applicable to either gender? Conversely, female homosexuals are referred to as lesbians (the litany of slang terms aside), which is gender specific. Is there a non-slang term for male homosexuals - an equivalent to 'lesbian'? I am being serious about this. And I hope I am not offending anyone by asking this question! 
				__________________ The thing about quotes on the internet is that you cannot verify their validity. - Abraham Lincoln | 
|   | Submit to Quotes   | 
|  02-03-2011, 04:22 PM | #5 | 
| Thank you, that is all Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: just north of the magic 
					Posts: 187
				          | I am still on hot young men kissing . . . | 
|   | Submit to Quotes   | 
|  02-03-2011, 04:46 PM | #6 | 
| Kink of Swank | Kevy, I've always wondered that myself.  I think it's a bit retarded, since both girls and boys who are attracted to members of their own sex are gay.  So I loathe the acronym LGBT, as I think it's redundant. (And don't get me started on LGBTQII - lordy!) Perhaps "lesbian" is accepted because there is no male counterpart. Well, maybe "faggot," but you can see why that won't fly. But to paraphrase Rodney King, "can't we all just be gay?" | 
|   | Submit to Quotes   | 
|  02-03-2011, 06:07 PM | #7 | 
| Worn Romantic Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Long Beach California 
					Posts: 8,435
				            | "Homosexual" and "gay" do usually refer to both genders ("homosexual" especially).  As to why there is no male equivalent to "lesbian", I truely do not know. 
				__________________ Unrestrained frivolity will lead to the downfall of modern society. | 
|   | Submit to Quotes   | 
|  02-03-2011, 06:53 PM | #8 | ||
| Chowder Head Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Yes 
					Posts: 18,500
				            | Quote: 
 Looking on Wikipedia (that definitive fount of accurate knowledge  ) under Homosexuality, echos the sentiment that "Gay' is often used for men: Quote: 
 I would be afraid of starting a movement to 'create' a new, male specific moniker for it would surely create a horrible 'safe' word that would be repulsive and nobody would use it. ETA: another one that should be gender neutral but tends to be applied to men is 'queer'. Is that considered a potentially derogatory term - sort of like it is okay for one homosexual to use when talking to another, but not for breeders to use to describe dem gays? Kind of like a rainbow version of the "N" word? 
				__________________ The thing about quotes on the internet is that you cannot verify their validity. - Abraham Lincoln | ||
|   | Submit to Quotes   | 
|  02-03-2011, 08:15 PM | #9 | 
| I throw stones at houses Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Location: Location 
					Posts: 9,534
				            | Queer seems to often be applied also to trans folks, so no, I'm not sure that's entirely a gay male thing 
				__________________ http://bash.org/?top "It is useless for sheep to pass a resolution in favor of vegetarianism while wolves remain of a different opinion." -- William Randolph Inge | 
|   | Submit to Quotes   | 
|  02-03-2011, 08:59 PM | #10 | 
| Kink of Swank | Actually, queer is quickly picking up steam amongst not-strictly-straight youngsters of all genders and persuasions.  I like it. Not more than Gay. I really like Gay. Absolutely, wiki is right - it's mostly referring to men. But it technically applies to anyone who is homosexual. Too bad I never hear gay girls refer to themselves that way. And, ycch, Lesbian. What an ugly word. (Quoting from something, but I forget what.) | 
|   | Submit to Quotes   |