Lounge of Tomorrow

Lounge of Tomorrow (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/index.php)
-   Lounge Lizard (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/forumdisplay.php?f=11)
-   -   WTF Stories of the Week (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/showthread.php?t=7619)

BarTopDancer 06-19-2008 12:42 PM

Canadian Court Overturns Father's grounding of 12 y/o Girl

Story here

Quote:

OTTAWA (AFP) - A Canadian court has lifted a 12-year-old girl's grounding, overturning her father's punishment for disobeying his orders to stay off the Internet, his lawyer said Wednesday.
ADVERTISEMENT

The girl had taken her father to Quebec Superior Court after he refused to allow her to go on a school trip for chatting on websites he tried to block, and then posting "inappropriate" pictures of herself online using a friend's computer.

Prudence 06-19-2008 12:50 PM

Russian spa opens monument to the enema.

Kevy Baby 06-19-2008 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarTopDancer (Post 219173)
Canadian Court Overturns Father's grounding of 12 y/o Girl

Story here

Okay... no

I see in reading the story that there is an ongoing custody battle (people should NOT use the children as pawns in a divorce!), but even so, this case should not have gone to court. It is not up to the courts to subvert parental authority (I am talking about grounding or taking away privileges: obviously I am not about to condone child abuse).

cirquelover 06-19-2008 01:13 PM

I'm sorry but if I ground my son for going on the internet and posting inappropriate pictures than he is grounded. The court can say what they want but I'm not letting my child endanger himself. I understand this is an unusual case with a 10 year custody batle but since when can the courts tell me what is appropriate for my child. If I'm abusing my child that is one thing and I should be punished but I won't let my child inadvertantly allow himself to be abused by the internet at such a young age!

Ghoulish Delight 06-19-2008 01:20 PM

I'm guessing there's more to this than the story reports. For instance, with a 10 year custody battle, perhaps the father simply is not considered a guardian and does not have the right to inflict punishment. Also, it says "refused to allow her to go on a school trip." Does that mean the trip already happened? If so, what exactly is the point of "overturning" the grounding if the damage has already been done? Is this a gambit by the mother to gain an edge in the custody battle?

I'm taking this story with a whole lot of salt grains.

SzczerbiakManiac 06-19-2008 04:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Prudence (Post 219177)

Quoting from that article, "An enema is almost a symbol of our region." Really?!? You should put that on your tourist literature!

And that monument really ought to be a fountain!

Kevy Baby 06-19-2008 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Prudence (Post 219177)

EneMan should have been at the unveiling


Kevy Baby 06-19-2008 05:07 PM

Eye-catching thong gives rise to lawsuit
Woman claims eye was damaged by piece from Victoria’s Secret underwear

Quote:

“I was putting on my underwear from Victoria’s Secret, and the metal popped into my eye,” Patterson told TODAY’s Meredith Vieira Thursday from Los Angeles.
Uh, honey: you supposed to put the underwear on your WAIST, not your HEAD.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Patterson's Lawyer
“Victoria’s Secret does have its angels, but as we say, the devil is in the details”

Whole Story

JWBear 06-19-2008 05:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kevy Baby (Post 219254)
EneMan should have been at the unveiling


Oh man... My job doesn't look so bad now. :eek:

Disneyphile 06-19-2008 06:00 PM

Oh, fling... fling a thong...
Make it stretchy...
So it doesn't pull up wrong...
Don't worry that it might rub against the crack of your big rear...
Just fling... fling a thong...


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:08 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.