Lounge of Tomorrow

Lounge of Tomorrow (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/index.php)
-   Lounge Lizard (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/forumdisplay.php?f=11)
-   -   WTF Stories of the Week (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/showthread.php?t=7619)

JWBear 03-11-2011 10:18 AM

"Trivial" being the operative word.

Kevy Baby 03-11-2011 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JWBear (Post 343552)
"Trivial" being the operative word.

No, Moonliner should have said it was a "simple" task, which means that the main thing the TSA did wrong was take to long to discover and correct this matter.

I suspect that it may have been discovered because some groups was discovered to be planning to exploit that weakness.

Alex 03-11-2011 12:19 PM

The article specifically mentions that it wasn't done in response to any intelligence, just their own internal process of looking at things that could be exploited.

Personally I think sounds like a stupid over-reaction to a low risk but the reactions in the article are as well. Sudden decompression at 35,000 without immediate access to oxygen isn't really a death risk to most people unless, for some reason, the pilot decides to keep the plane at altitude (after all, people free climb Everest to 30k feet without supplemental oxygen, unpleasant but not fatal).

Moonliner 03-11-2011 12:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex (Post 343577)
The article specifically mentions that it wasn't done in response to any intelligence, just their own internal process of looking at things that could be exploited.

I'm not sure how much their comment on that is worth. Somehow I doubt they would say: In response to plans we found on a thumb drive in a bombed out Afghanistan cave we have decided to remove these devices.

Alex 03-11-2011 12:43 PM

Other than that for every stupid security measure they've taken in the past they've only been too happy to say "we've heard whispers of terrorists thinking about possibly in the future having a meeting to discuss the possibility of considering plans of action that theoretically could lead to them doing this thing we're preventing."

Moonliner 03-11-2011 12:45 PM

Alcohol Detectors Could Come Standard With a New Car

Quote:

A new law under consideration in California would call for installation of a device that would allow six violations before stalling the car

It's called "The Roads Safe Act" and opponents claim it's designed to put an alcohol detector in every car, just like an airbag or stereo.
Ok, where's the Poo? Whenever I see something that smells this bad I assume it's being used to cover up some lesser smell to make it more fragrant. Are they looking to raise the drinking age? Drop the legal limit? What is it?

Moonliner 03-11-2011 12:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex (Post 343584)
Other than that for every stupid security measure they've taken in the past they've only been too happy to say "we've heard whispers of terrorists thinking about possibly in the future having a meeting to discuss the possibility of considering plans of action that theoretically could lead to them doing this thing we're preventing."

Which is exactly what makes me think there is more to this particular story.

Alex 03-11-2011 01:00 PM

Apparnetly they fixed a typo since you quoted that. It is not a California bill but a federal bill introduced by Tom Udall of New Mexico.

And when I read an article that generic about a bill I wonder if the writer read it.

It's here. It says nothing about making these things standard. All it does is provide money for doing research on the implications of broadening their use.

Disneyphile 03-22-2011 06:57 PM

Pole Dancing for Jesus

Even I can't make that stuff up. ;)

alphabassettgrrl 03-22-2011 09:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Disneyphile (Post 344202)

Awesome. :)

I think they actually mean well, too. So it's actually kind of cool.... :)


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:10 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.