Lounge of Tomorrow

Lounge of Tomorrow (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/index.php)
-   Lounge Lizard (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/forumdisplay.php?f=11)
-   -   Commodification of sex (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/showthread.php?t=5161)

tracilicious 01-29-2007 08:04 AM

Commodification of sex
 
I wanted to talk about this some more, but I would prefer to do it in a thread that doesn't involve my offspring.

Is the commodification of sex really that bad a thing? What about the people that can't get sex? Is prostitution really that bad a thing if it's regulated and all parties consent? It's going to happen anyways.

How about commercially? Is the fact that sex sells not due largely in part to the fact that humans are sexual beings and that's what we like seeing? When does it become a degradation of women? Can each woman choose whether or not it degrades her? I know that no add or strip club can make me feel degraded.

Thoughts?

3894 01-29-2007 08:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tracilicious (Post 117297)
I know that no add or strip club can make me feel degraded.

Right but in what way is a strip club a reflection of female sexuality, meaning response to visual stimulation and depersonalization of sex? (Please don't tell anyone I just wrote that sentence. It's terrible but you get what I mean. Men respond much more directly to visual stimulation and so on.)

I'm okay with the commodification of sex for adults. But I'm not going to deform my female sexuality to conform to what men tell me is sexy.

€uroMeinke 01-29-2007 08:18 AM

Today we visited the Norton Simon Museum of Art. Among their collection is a stone temple carving of a couple (man and woman) in a pre-coital position. (Perhaps someone who took some pics of this one can post them here). I mention this as another model, where sex is part of a religious or spiritual experience - whether or not that existed in place of commodification, I don't know, but it is another point of reference.

I suppose one element of living in a capitalist society is that ultimately everything gets assigned a dollar value, that crassness one the one hand offends us and so we object to it's use for certain things, like sex or happiness. Nonetheless, it may well be this sublimation that makes it so effective as a marketing tool.

I'm curious to see where this discussion will lead. To answer directly for myself, a tend to be a moral relativist so I see no inherent right or wrong in the situation you describe, but I think it telling none-the-less of our own values and insecurities.

€uroMeinke 01-29-2007 08:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 3894 (Post 117299)
Right but in what way is a strip club a reflection of female sexuality, meaning response to visual stimulation and depersonalization of sex? (Please don't tell anyone I just wrote that sentence. It's terrible but you get what I mean. Men respond much more directly to visual stimulation and so on.)

Just a clarification as this is a generalization, I'm not so sure here is some universal "female sexuality." And while men may be more visual, it seems that at least some women enjoy being viewed and desired sexually. But I'm a guy and maybe I read too many letters to Penthouse growing up.

Any strippers (current or ex) that post here?

bewitched 01-29-2007 08:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by €uroMeinke (Post 117300)
Today we visited the Norton Simon Museum of Art. Among their collection is a stone temple carving of a couple (man and woman) in a pre-coital position.


Is this the one?

3894 01-29-2007 08:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by €uroMeinke (Post 117300)

I suppose one element of living in a capitalist society is that ultimately everything gets assigned a dollar value

Well said. :snap:

innerSpaceman 01-29-2007 08:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bewitched (Post 117303)
Is this the one?

Yep, that's it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by 3894 (Post 117299)
... but in what way is a strip club a reflection of female sexuality, meaning response to visual stimulation and depersonalization of sex?

I don't see what that has to do with it. To be "sexy," one has to appeal sexually to the object of one's desire/purpose. If that object is men, then you appeal to, among other things, their strong visual sense of sex.

To appeal to men is very much a natural part of (hetero) women's sexuality. And the use of sex appeal for money, favors, survival, revenge, and a host of other goals is hardly unnatural to the female species either, imo.



.

Cadaverous Pallor 01-29-2007 09:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by innerSpaceman (Post 117309)
Yep, that's it.


I don't see what that has to do with it. To be "sexy," one has to appeal sexually to the object of one's desire/purpose. If that object is men, then you appeal to, among other things, their strong visual sense of sex.

To appeal to men is very much a natural part of (hetero) women's sexuality. And the use of sex appeal for money, favors, survival, revenge, and a host of other goals is hardly unnatural to the female species either, imo.



.

What he said!

I have a friend who's an erotic model. Just to be clear - she gets naked, gets in outfits, gets tied up, often tortured to some degree, and photos are taken. No sex on camera, but still, obviously these pics are for men to get off on. She loves what she does. She's bookish, intelligent, funny, and completely down to earth about her job. Her husband is a set builder and they work together. She's also finishing up business school and has had plenty of "normal" jobs.

I have no problem with her occupation. There's a need to be filled. People love porn, especially men, and there's no possible future where this won't be so. To pretend that we can have porn and not have the "objectification of women" or men for that matter is ridiculous. There's plenty of porn that includes the worship of women and the torture of men, as well.

I'll say it - I like being objectified, and I like objectifying my husband. But that's just one aspect of a multi-faceted sexual relationship. Sometimes we make love, sometimes we fck.

Ghoulish Delight 01-29-2007 09:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 3894 (Post 117299)
But I'm not going to deform my female sexuality to conform to what men tell me is sexy.

And yet many of the same women who insist on this kind of personal credo would have men "deform their male sexuality" (setting aside for a moment €'s astute point that that assumes some sort of uniform gender sexuality) and forgo their desire for visual stimulation.

I'm with iSm on this one, while there's certainly something to be said for ones own internal model of sexuality, ultimately the goal is to appeal to someone else. Like any other aspect of ones personality you will continually be faced with the choice of sticking to your guns vs. making a compromise to please someone else.

There's got to be a balance and considering that appealing to the opposite sex is what has gotten our species this far, I'm in favor of that practice continuing.

LSPoorEeyorick 01-29-2007 09:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by innerSpaceman (Post 117309)
To be "sexy," one has to appeal sexually to the object of one's desire/purpose.

I would disagree with that statement. Feeling "sexy" sometimes has nothing to do with an object of desire-- tangible or intangible. For instance, I used to own a little blue dress. It was cute and draped perfectly around my cleavage. I remember vividly the feeling of sexiness in that dress, not because I cared if the robots at the insurance company noticed, but because I was attracted to myself when I wore it. Single women wear lingerie to bed sometimes, or wear racy panties, and it isn't always for an audience. Sexiness for sexiness' sake is allowed.

As far as the commodification of sexuality-- my concern with prostitution, porn, and stripping is for the women who feel as though they have no other choice. There's also an unusually high rate of survivors of sexual abuse within the strip industry, and my experience at a strip club once sort of dripped of sadness-- they certainly didn't seem to be enjoying their job. (And while I admit I'm really not visually stimulated, sexually speaking, I don't think that observation was colored by my concern-- in fact, it was the basis of it.) If it makes them happy, that's great. But I am not naive enough to believe that all of them are.

That said, Chris is right that there isn't one homogenous "female sexuality." Though I'm not visually stimulated, it doesn't mean that there are no women who are. And though I've come to desire a deeper, spiritual connection sexually, it doesn't mean that we all do. Desires differ.

I was shocked to listen to a woman in my life describe her desire to limit her son's MTV watching, because she didn't want her son to get a skewed idea of women and sex. "Women don't want sex," she said, "they don't just chase you down the hall." Well, here in my home they do. That conversation proved to me that women's sexuality isn't just one set of rules or one checklist of what's necessary for the feeling of desire.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:54 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.