The random political thoughts thread (Part Deux)

Nephythys · 10-16-2006, 08:40 AM

So where is the ourtrage?

Ken Starr has an investigation that goes on for years and spends oodles of money and is vilified for it.

Fitzgerald knows immediately where the leak was- yet he "investigates" for years and spends oodles of money only to uncover- nothing.

I guess it all depends on which side is being "investigated"

Alex · 10-16-2006, 02:02 PM

Iraq Body Count, long dismissed by the right as offering inflated mortality numbers for Iraq has serious questions about the Lancet study. And they are good ones.

http://www.iraqbodycount.org/press/pr14.php

Note: They do not dismiss the study as ideologically flawed. They assume an earnest attempt but find the outcome sufficiently flawed (read the details) that they believe there must have been a flaw in the random sampling.

10-16-2006, 08:40 AM	#1
Nephythys Yeah, that's about it- Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: In a state of constant crap to get done Posts: 2,688	So where is the ourtrage? Ken Starr has an investigation that goes on for years and spends oodles of money and is vilified for it. Fitzgerald knows immediately where the leak was- yet he "investigates" for years and spends oodles of money only to uncover- nothing. I guess it all depends on which side is being "investigated"
	Submit to Quotes

10-16-2006, 02:02 PM	#2
Alex . Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 13,354	Iraq Body Count, long dismissed by the right as offering inflated mortality numbers for Iraq has serious questions about the Lancet study. And they are good ones. http://www.iraqbodycount.org/press/pr14.php Note: They do not dismiss the study as ideologically flawed. They assume an earnest attempt but find the outcome sufficiently flawed (read the details) that they believe there must have been a flaw in the random sampling.
	Submit to Quotes