![]() |
€uromeinke, FEJ. and Ghoulish Delight RULE!!! NA abides. |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
I Floop the Pig
|
The rules vary state-by-state. I believe the most common setup is the choice of "the bible or no sacred text at all," but I don't have anything to support that.
__________________
'He who receives an idea from me, receives instruction himself without lessening mine; as he who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me.' -TJ |
|
|
Submit to Quotes
|
|
|
#2 |
|
.
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 13,354
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
While some jurisdictions may still offer the use of a bible for swearing in (I just asked a PD lawyer friend of mine and she says she's never been in a courtroom that ever uses a bible or any other prop) there is no jurisdiction where it would be required to swear on a bible and the option to simply affirm to tell the truth is the standard so far as I know.
|
|
|
Submit to Quotes
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Doing The Job
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: In a state
Posts: 3,956
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I believe (but am not positive) that the "or afffirm" option was not originally designed as an accommodation to non-believers, but rather as an accommodation to those whose religious beliefs prohibit the taking of oaths.
__________________
Live now-pay later. Diner's Club! |
|
|
Submit to Quotes
|
|
|
#4 |
|
.
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 13,354
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The Constitution repeatedly refers to "oath or affirmation" so I guess it goes back to English common law.
|
|
|
Submit to Quotes
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Doing The Job
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: In a state
Posts: 3,956
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
And the final word on the subject. Or at least the faithful word.
http://www.thefaithfulword.org/oaths.html
__________________
Live now-pay later. Diner's Club! |
|
|
Submit to Quotes
|