![]() |
€uromeinke, FEJ. and Ghoulish Delight RULE!!! NA abides. |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Kink of Swank
|
Quote:
Technically, I suppose the answer is Yes ... but seeing that formations are what bands do best (with pure marching their most boring function), I rather like seeing a few cool formations in the parade. To me, it's not the same as some float stopping while someone sings a song. |
|
|
|
Submit to Quotes
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
ohhhh baby
|
Quote:
This used to be a parade, and now it's a television show.
__________________
The second star to the right shines in the night for you |
|
|
|
Submit to Quotes
|
|
|
#3 |
|
8/30/14 - Disneyland -10k or Bust.
|
Certainly the vast majority of people who enjoy the parade do so via a television set, so yes there are some elements of a TV show present. However I can't agree that the entire parade is a TV show. When they change the name to the Viagra Tournament of Roses parade or reroute the parade to exclude that pesky bridge (which limits float size) then I'll be on board with you.
__________________
- Taking it one step at a time.
|
|
|
Submit to Quotes
|
|
|
#4 |
|
.
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 13,354
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
Submit to Quotes
|
|
|
#5 | ||
|
ohhhh baby
|
Quote:
Quote:
In your humble opinion. I have been watching the parade since I was very young and have always loved it, "boring" or not. I'm not going to chime in with all those above that say that most of the parade is boring. I love every bit of it, including the equestrian units. It may be that it's a comfort thing for me but I still say that the parade was entertaining in the early 80's and there's no reason it should have these lame changes. Speaking of comfort - it's going to be hard to not watch KTLA next year, but I think I'll have to push through it. NA & € get HGTV, right?
__________________
The second star to the right shines in the night for you |
||
|
|
Submit to Quotes
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
.
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 13,354
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Of course, I'm also ruined by having had to attend many really lame parades because my first wife was marching in them. Plus, the "Rose Parade" is a Portland thing that I must insist was stolen by Pasadena 17 years before Portland thought of it. The sneaky bastards. |
|
|
|
Submit to Quotes
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
ohhhh baby
|
Quote:
I like public spectacles and large crowd gatherings.
__________________
The second star to the right shines in the night for you |
|
|
|
Submit to Quotes
|
|
|
#8 |
|
.
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 13,354
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Ok, what is the DooDah parade?
|
|
|
Submit to Quotes
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 481
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
I think the Tournament of Roses Parade and the Grand Floral Parade are good on TV because of the all-floral nature - other ones, not so much. And Mardi Gras parades would (and do) make Horrid television. The floats are quite ugly on TV (and many are in person, too, for that matter) - and the main reason for floats is to hold riders who then throw throws. You don't get any of that on Television. (But please don't make me give up Le Krewe D'Etat parade with potentially ugly floats but biting commentary!) |
|
|
|
Submit to Quotes
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
.
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 13,354
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
That's my problem with the Rose Parade (either one) on TV. The attraction is that the floats are all organic and yet that doesn't show up well on TV. Many of the floats they could just be painted and you'd hardly know the difference. At least a giant balloon maiming people on the streets of New York has some drama. |
|
|
|
Submit to Quotes
|