The death penalty - Page 6

Nephythys · 03-03-2005, 10:39 AM

from where I stand the stance I see is some sort of worry about the vague possibility of getting the wrong guy- what about when it is certainly not the wrong guy?

*sigh*

Ghoulish Delight · 03-03-2005, 10:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nephythys

from where I stand the stance I see is some sort of worry about the vague possibility of getting the wrong guy- what about when it is certainly not the wrong guy?

*sigh*

Read my post. 1) Ineffective deterrent 2) Ineffective form of retribution 3) far more than vague possiblity of wrongful death (see MBC's stats). Pointless and imprecise.

Nephythys · 03-03-2005, 10:53 AM

I did read your post- I asked a different question, however I withdraw it. Pointless to proceed with it at this point.

It would not be ineffective deterrent if used quickly upon completion of the full course of the law.

Look- I am not all gung ho throwing parties when someone is executed. It's an unpleasant business- but I think if you start removing it completely you have a problem.

Claire · 03-03-2005, 10:56 AM

I have a headache after reading all that. I'd kill for some Advil right now.

Ghoulish Delight · 03-03-2005, 11:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nephythys

I did read your post- I asked a different question, however I withdraw it. Pointless to proceed with it at this point.

It would not be ineffective deterrent if used quickly upon completion of the full course of the law.

Look- I am not all gung ho throwing parties when someone is executed. It's an unpleasant business- but I think if you start removing it completely you have a problem.

That post is my answer. I'm against it period, partly because you can't draw a line between "positive" and "maybe", so it's not worth the risk. As for quick completeion, that's just not an option. Sure, if there was some magic way that we could be 100% sure, and whisk someone off to the gas chamber, then that's one thing. But it's not possible, and too many times, the lengthy appeals process exhonerates wrongly convicted people who would have been killed had the process been quicker. It's an impossible thing to solve. Speed it up, and the likelihood of making a mistake increases. Slow it down and the point becomes moot. So now you're just killing for the gratification of the victims' families which brings me to my third point, that it doesn't even satisfy that need.

innerSpaceman · 03-03-2005, 03:02 PM

I don't care if you catch the guy in the act and thus can be sure that he murdered someone. Murdering him in return is not right. Taking a human life is God's province alone. No war, no self-defense, no retailiation makes it right. It may be necessary to do so (in the instance of self-defense, for example), but necessity doesn't make it right.

So, my personal stance is not based on innocent people being executed (though they are), or whether the death penalty is a deterrent (it's not), or whether victims' families feel no closure (they generally don't), or whether it's more expensive to execute someone than to support them for life in prison (it is), or whether the death penalty is unfairly applied to poor people and people of color (it is). It's based on the fact that, according to my personal moral values, it's absolutely, positively morally wrong.

Motorboat Cruiser · 03-03-2005, 03:09 PM

You and I are in total agreement, iSm.

So, do I win anything for "worst idea for a thread topic" ?

innerSpaceman · 03-03-2005, 03:15 PM

No, it's ok. Just because GC doesn't want to read this or Neph is getting a little hot under the collar, does not mean you shouldn't post provocative threads.

When starting the LoT, we considered not having a "political" forum at all, as the conversations tend to veer from cool swankness. In the end, however, we decided that we would certainly not make it a highlight of these boards, but to deny any discussion of the real world would also be less than fully swanky.

€uroMeinke · 03-03-2005, 05:41 PM

I don't understand why people feel that beliefs have to be consistent - why can't I believe on thing in one situation and it's opposite in another? I hold many inconsistent beliefs - so?

alphabassettgrrl · 03-03-2005, 05:41 PM

I have some issues with minors being executed; not because anything magically changes on the day they turn 18, but that is the legal standard we have set for ourselves, so yes, things do change on that day. If the prosecutors think they committed an adult crime, try them as an adult. If they don't meet the standards for that, then you try them as a juvenile. And I don't think it's proper to execute juveniles; then again, I don't think it's appropriate to release them at 21 either. "Ok, boys, you've spent time in jail, so now go play nice". Right.

Executing adults? Slightly different issue. If one is capable of understanding the rules of society, and you break them, yes, you are subject to dying if that's the rule. If you're not capable of understanding and following the rules, you need to be someplace where you are supervised. Who gets to decide? That gets sticky.

You're right that the death penalty has serious problems. It's not a proper deterrent, it is improperly applied, and it doesn't give closure to the families. But really, I think some crimes are so horrific that the person doesn't deserve to continue breathing.

I do agree that Texas plays fast and loose with the rules. Too quick to execute people.

I guess my answer is that I agree with the death penalty in some cases, but I think less than we currently have it.

03-03-2005, 10:39 AM	#51
Nephythys Yeah, that's about it- Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: In a state of constant crap to get done Posts: 2,688	from where I stand the stance I see is some sort of worry about the vague possibility of getting the wrong guy- what about when it is certainly not the wrong guy? sigh
	Submit to Quotes

03-03-2005, 10:53 AM	#53
Nephythys Yeah, that's about it- Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: In a state of constant crap to get done Posts: 2,688	I did read your post- I asked a different question, however I withdraw it. Pointless to proceed with it at this point. It would not be ineffective deterrent if used quickly upon completion of the full course of the law. Look- I am not all gung ho throwing parties when someone is executed. It's an unpleasant business- but I think if you start removing it completely you have a problem.
	Submit to Quotes

03-03-2005, 10:56 AM	#54
Claire Shagilicious Disneyland!! Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Fulfilling my destiny..... Posts: 740	I have a headache after reading all that. I'd kill for some Advil right now. __________________ Miles: It tastes like the back of a fing L.A. school bus. Now they probably didn't de-stem, hoping for some semblance of concentration, crushed it up with leaves and mice, and then wound up with this rancid tar and turpentine bull**. Fin' Raid. Jack: Tastes pretty good to me.
	Submit to Quotes

03-03-2005, 03:02 PM	#56
innerSpaceman Kink of Swank Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Inner Space Posts: 13,075	I don't care if you catch the guy in the act and thus can be sure that he murdered someone. Murdering him in return is not right. Taking a human life is God's province alone. No war, no self-defense, no retailiation makes it right. It may be necessary to do so (in the instance of self-defense, for example), but necessity doesn't make it right. So, my personal stance is not based on innocent people being executed (though they are), or whether the death penalty is a deterrent (it's not), or whether victims' families feel no closure (they generally don't), or whether it's more expensive to execute someone than to support them for life in prison (it is), or whether the death penalty is unfairly applied to poor people and people of color (it is). It's based on the fact that, according to my personal moral values, it's absolutely, positively morally wrong. Last edited by innerSpaceman : 03-03-2005 at 03:12 PM.
	Submit to Quotes

03-03-2005, 03:09 PM	#57
Motorboat Cruiser Cruiser of Motorboats Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: So Cal Posts: 3,665	You and I are in total agreement, iSm. So, do I win anything for "worst idea for a thread topic" ?
	Submit to Quotes

03-03-2005, 03:15 PM	#58
innerSpaceman Kink of Swank Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Inner Space Posts: 13,075	No, it's ok. Just because GC doesn't want to read this or Neph is getting a little hot under the collar, does not mean you shouldn't post provocative threads. When starting the LoT, we considered not having a "political" forum at all, as the conversations tend to veer from cool swankness. In the end, however, we decided that we would certainly not make it a highlight of these boards, but to deny any discussion of the real world would also be less than fully swanky.
	Submit to Quotes

03-03-2005, 05:41 PM	#59
€uroMeinke L'Hédoniste Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: A.S.C.O.T. Posts: 8,671	I don't understand why people feel that beliefs have to be consistent - why can't I believe on thing in one situation and it's opposite in another? I hold many inconsistent beliefs - so? __________________ I would believe only in a God that knows how to Dance. Friedrich Nietzsche
	Submit to Quotes

03-03-2005, 05:41 PM	#60
alphabassettgrrl Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 4,978	I have some issues with minors being executed; not because anything magically changes on the day they turn 18, but that is the legal standard we have set for ourselves, so yes, things do change on that day. If the prosecutors think they committed an adult crime, try them as an adult. If they don't meet the standards for that, then you try them as a juvenile. And I don't think it's proper to execute juveniles; then again, I don't think it's appropriate to release them at 21 either. "Ok, boys, you've spent time in jail, so now go play nice". Right. Executing adults? Slightly different issue. If one is capable of understanding the rules of society, and you break them, yes, you are subject to dying if that's the rule. If you're not capable of understanding and following the rules, you need to be someplace where you are supervised. Who gets to decide? That gets sticky. You're right that the death penalty has serious problems. It's not a proper deterrent, it is improperly applied, and it doesn't give closure to the families. But really, I think some crimes are so horrific that the person doesn't deserve to continue breathing. I do agree that Texas plays fast and loose with the rules. Too quick to execute people. I guess my answer is that I agree with the death penalty in some cases, but I think less than we currently have it.
	Submit to Quotes