One Above All

Name · 03-07-2005, 01:44 AM

interesting math, but the part that isn't in there is the fact that several families had/have more then 1 or 2 children and some had over 5 children. So that formula for backtracking the population isn't quite scientifically sound(and for far more reasons then the before mentioned, just don't feel like thinking that much into it right now).

sleepyjeff · 03-07-2005, 02:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Name

interesting math, but the part that isn't in there is the fact that several families had/have more then 1 or 2 children and some had over 5 children. So that formula for backtracking the population isn't quite scientifically sound(and for far more reasons then the before mentioned, just don't feel like thinking that much into it right now).

...or maybe(maebe) everyone is everyones cousin

Cadaverous Pallor · 03-07-2005, 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sleepyjeff

...or maybe(maebe) everyone is everyones cousin

Yes, we are all related to some degree. Name is right, there is faulty logic in there.

03-07-2005, 01:44 AM	#1
Name Title Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: here Posts: 779	interesting math, but the part that isn't in there is the fact that several families had/have more then 1 or 2 children and some had over 5 children. So that formula for backtracking the population isn't quite scientifically sound(and for far more reasons then the before mentioned, just don't feel like thinking that much into it right now). __________________ Signature
	Submit to Quotes