![]() |
€uromeinke, FEJ. and Ghoulish Delight RULE!!! NA abides. |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Kink of Swank
|
Perhaps in a nation where smoking is so prevalent, the health consequences have become more pronounced. Economics aside, I can't see how you can argue that smoking should be allowed in public places where non-smokers are permitted to be.
The hermetically-sealed environments are the way to go. All other smoking directly affects the health of others. I don't see why there should be a "freedom" to make other people sick via one's personal drug habits. |
|
|
Submit to Quotes
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: East Bay Area, CA
Posts: 3,156
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
As a soon to be resident, I say hallelujah.
|
|
|
Submit to Quotes
|
|
|
#3 |
|
.
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 13,354
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I agree with iSm to some extent. We've goen about it completely bass ackwards in this country. The case for prohibiting smoking in public spaces is much stronger than for doing so in private spaces.
Of course, I consider private businesses to be private spaces so I don't support restaurant and bar bans. Instead of shoving them all out in the street outside the bar, keep them in the bar and I'll decide if I want to join them. |
|
|
Submit to Quotes
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: East Bay Area, CA
Posts: 3,156
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
Submit to Quotes
|