![]() |
€uromeinke, FEJ. and Ghoulish Delight RULE!!! NA abides. |
|
![]() |
#1 | |||
What?
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,635
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Have we? I'm not so convinced. I see us as more "little guy vs big guy", with the level of justice received directly in proportion to one's ability to pay for legal representation. That is, of course, a gross oversimplification but I think it gets the point across. There are some little guys gaming the system, to be sure. Your "welfare queens", as coined by Mr. Reagan, would be an example. They disgust me. On the other side are our corporations, flush with cash, who practically write their own legislation. They disgust me.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The challenge still remains... I haven't seen this activity that scaeagles refers to. If you, or anyone else has, please enlighten me. |
|||
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
.
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 13,354
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
The English Rule removes the incentive for a defendant to settle simply because it would be cheaper than going to court (even if they're in the right). It also removes the incentive for lawyers to take fringe cases on contingency knowing that it only takes a certain percentage settling out of court (for the above reason) to come out in the black on the whole endeavor. Massive class action suits are also more difficult to form in most other countries and caps on punitive damages are more common as well. |
|
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
What?
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,635
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |