The Schiavo issue

[Nephythys]

In reference to the link- I was not even referring to the Dr's report (in fact I did not read the article myself- so I am not about to even debate it)- I was specifically focused on Rachel's commentary and on the nurses affidavit- so this paper tiger was a construct of your own imagination, not my intentional set-up. It was not the purpose of my link- so quibble all you like about the Dr.

The nurses information however seems highly explosive- so the question of why more is not being made of it is very pertinent.

(It's shy-vo)


In the interest ot providing another side to the story-Nurses Affidavit dismissed as "incredible"

[Prudence]

Originally Posted by Nephythys

In reference to the link- I was not even referring to the Dr's report (in fact I did not read the article myself- so I am not about to even debate it)- I was specifically focused on Rachel's commentary and on the nurses affidavit- so this paper tiger was a construct of your own imagination, not my intentional set-up. It was not the purpose of my link- so quibble all you like about the Dr.

You posted a URL you labelled as "links" (note the plural) to "lots of good points." The doctor bit was the first thing on there when I followed the URL this morning. How dare I actually *READ* what was posted via a link you describe as "lots of good points"! How dare I look at everything there when, despite your use of the plural, you only wanted people to look at one specific item carefully chosen to showcase your agenda! Well of course we don't want to debate that; that would just be silly!

Perhaps you'd like to borrow my tinfoil hat? My paper tiger did nibble on the edges a bit, but it still works just as well as it always did.

[Nephythys]

Originally Posted by Prudence

You posted a URL you labelled as "links" (note the plural) to "lots of good points." The doctor bit was the first thing on there when I followed the URL this morning. How dare I actually *READ* what was posted via a link you describe as "lots of good points"! How dare I look at everything there when, despite your use of the plural, you only wanted people to look at one specific item carefully chosen to showcase your agenda! Well of course we don't want to debate that; that would just be silly!

Perhaps you'd like to borrow my tinfoil hat? My paper tiger did nibble on the edges a bit, but it still works just as well as it always did.

Spare me- please. I was just saying that even I did not read the article on the Dr- so I was not going to debate it- and I did specifically point out the nurses statement. I am not showcasing anything- especially since it was ME who posted the article about the nurses statement being dismissed. And I am certainly allowed to post things that suit my view- you are not being forced to do diddly.

You know- I am used to swimming with the big bad liberal sharks here and am also used to being the guppy and I am used to getting my guppy ass beat up around here (even when I'm right )- but I don't appreciate your tone. You did not even make the paper tiger comment- but the person who did doesn't feel the need to insult me. I fail to see why you do?