Is the irrelevance of the Grammys a good thing?

innerSpaceman · 02-14-2008, 10:19 AM

On the other hand ... and I didn't watch this year's show ... their awards ceremony is usally 8,000 times more entertaining than any other, simply by virtue of featuing so many musical performances. I appreciate that, even if I don't like the performances. And often times, I've been pleasantly surprised.

They have the good sense, btw, to give away hundreds of Best Polka Band type awards in the hours before the broadcast, leaving room on the show for only a tiny percentage of top prizes and lots of musical acts.

02-14-2008, 10:19 AM	#2
innerSpaceman Kink of Swank Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Inner Space Posts: 13,075	On the other hand ... and I didn't watch this year's show ... their awards ceremony is usally 8,000 times more entertaining than any other, simply by virtue of featuing so many musical performances. I appreciate that, even if I don't like the performances. And often times, I've been pleasantly surprised. They have the good sense, btw, to give away hundreds of Best Polka Band type awards in the hours before the broadcast, leaving room on the show for only a tiny percentage of top prizes and lots of musical acts.
	Submit to Quotes