![]() |
€uromeinke, FEJ. and Ghoulish Delight RULE!!! NA abides. |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Cruiser of Motorboats
|
|
|
|
Submit to Quotes
|
|
|
#2 |
|
HI!
|
My earlier comment in response to this:
Quote:
was addressed to the view from the "outside" and how it is seen a justified under one condition and not justified under another when, in fact, both situations involve physical diseases they just effect different parts of the body. I agree that the effects of diseases differ greatly. The effects of your liver hurting is different than the effects and outcome of your brain not functioning properly. However, they are both illnesses. We, as a society, just seem to be more accepting of certain malfunctions of the body than of others. |
|
|
Submit to Quotes
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Cruiser of Motorboats
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
Submit to Quotes
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Doing The Job
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: In a state
Posts: 3,956
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
If you look at the DSM--and who wouldn't want to--most of the disorders, especially the milder ones, are defined with respect to the outer boundaries of a perceived norm and/or to the extent they inhibit day to day functioning. In this respect, mental illness is a weakness, the same way my asthma is a weakness, but that certainly doesn't make it blameworthy.
I think the stigma attaches because if we acknowledge that our mental disturbances and responses to them can be attributed to our genetic structure, we have to acknowledge that our finer personality traits are beyond our control as well.
__________________
Live now-pay later. Diner's Club! |
|
|
Submit to Quotes
|
|
|
#5 |
|
L'Hédoniste
|
The problem with the term "weakness" is it's a comparator and not really a fact. There are many who have turned their perceived weakness or disabilities into strengths so I'm not sure what is gained by characterizing such things as a weakness since any trait can be portrayed as such depending on the circumstances.
__________________
I would believe only in a God that knows how to Dance. Friedrich Nietzsche ![]() |
|
|
Submit to Quotes
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Kink of Swank
|
To play the semantics game a little further, I posit that people with cancer do have a weakness. We just won't be rude enough to say so. But if an antelope had cancer, that would be a weakness that might get them picked off by a puma. We just don't particularly care about hurting the antelope's feelings, so we call a spade a spade.
Funny how the same word, weakness, can tend to imply some sort of personal failing when we apply it to a human. But it's possible for Morigoon to have meant it, as she said, in very clinical terms. Too bad so many words are freighted with human judgment. They needn't be. Oh, except for "The Easy Way Out." That comes with judgment included free. ![]() |
|
|
Submit to Quotes
|
|
|
#7 |
|
L'Hédoniste
|
I think "weakness" is fine but it requires contest when used alone as an absolute it becomes a problem even in the most Darwinian examples. Certain "diseases" (e.g. Sickle Cell Anemia) while a potential weakness today were a strength before modern medicine caught up with the genetics.
Saying something is a weakness does nothing to further the dialogue on what to do or react to a particular condition, Rather it comes off as a dismissive way of saying, "that's not my problem."
__________________
I would believe only in a God that knows how to Dance. Friedrich Nietzsche ![]() |
|
|
Submit to Quotes
|
|
|
#8 |
|
scribblin'
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: in the moment
Posts: 3,872
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I think I bristle at the word in the context of disease - mental or otherwise. MBC's answer ("I'd call it an illness") was exactly what I said out loud before I scrolled down and saw it.
Sure - if you want to reduce things to objectivity, an illness can make things harder for someone. So if you want to call that "weak," that's probably apt, in a way. But I would argue that you can't separate implications from some words - and in this case, even if it's not intended, the word sounds cold, and harsh, and lacking in compassion. And I believe that it's the opposite of the kind of thing someone who, say, is battling depression, needs to hear. Would you say "I'm so glad you're getting treatment for your weakness" or "I'm so glad you're getting treatment for your illness"? Also, while in Cindy's strictest terms, the patient might be "weak" compared to someone who is not ill... the most strength I've ever seen in people has been in those who were fighting one illness or another. Even in those strict terms, I would never, ever, ever call my mother "weak" after twelve years of fighting. Because I've often said I can't imagine lasting a fraction of that time with her "weakness" - and her strength. |
|
|
Submit to Quotes
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Yeah, that's about it-
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In a state of constant crap to get done
Posts: 2,688
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
That was on my mind too- I had an "illness" I had cancer- it took strength to fight it, to make it to every treatment and deal with the toll on my body. I have also fought depression- it takes strength. Damn right it's strength when you fight those things- mental or physical. Last edited by Nephythys : 05-06-2008 at 07:55 AM. |
|
|
|
Submit to Quotes
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Beelzeboobs, Esq.
|
Damn skippy.
I had something else to say, but it's too personal. So I'll just repeat: damn skippy.
__________________
traguna macoities tracorum satis de |
|
|
Submit to Quotes
|