![]()  | 
	€uromeinke, FEJ. and Ghoulish Delight RULE!!! NA abides.  | 
		
			
  | 	
![]()  | 
	
	
		
		|||||||
![]()  | 
	
	
| 
		 | 
	Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes | 
| 
	 | 
| 		
			
			 | 
		#1 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Kink of Swank 
			
		
			
				
			
			
								
		
	 | 
	
	
	
	
		
		
		
		 I'm relieved, but confess to being a tad miffed California's economy won't have the lock on out-of-state gay weddings. 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
	
	Frankly, that was going to be an argument in favor of putting the kibosh on Prop. 8. Money talks.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
Submit to Quotes 
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
			
		
	 | 
| 		
			
			 | 
		#2 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Chowder Head 
			
		
			
				
			
			
			Join Date: Jan 2005 
				Location: Yes 
				
				
					Posts: 18,500
				 
				
				![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()  | 
	
	
	
	
		
		
		
		 I doubt that would have any significant impact on this issue. I don't see a lot of the religious right suddenly setting aside their beliefs because it might have a little positive impact on the state economy. If anything, it could work against the "No on 8" movement as the proponents of the amendment would just use as a "look at how weak the "No" argument is - they have to rely on this silly detail." 
		
	
		
		
		
		
			
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
	
	The thing about quotes on the internet is that you cannot verify their validity. 
			- Abraham Lincoln  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
Submit to Quotes 
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
			
		
	 |