Tis the season...deja vu anyone?

[€uroMeinke]

Originally Posted by Bornieo: Fully Loaded

pfft. Since "god" hasn't posted here, I doubt he exists...

God didn't want to be here anyway

[Bornieo: Fully Loaded]

I am A god, not THE God...

[Disneyphile]

Originally Posted by Bornieo: Fully Loaded

I am A god, not THE God...

Phew!

At least my polytheistic faith is now restored.

[Bornieo: Fully Loaded]

Originally Posted by Disneyphile

Phew!

At least my polytheistic faith is now restored.

That will be 7 Rick-Rolls and a Hail Walt please...

[flippyshark]

Sir Dillon,

In reply to:
"Also, you keep using the word "fallacious." I'm curious; what is the fallacy in our argument?"

you said:

Originally Posted by Sir Dillon

My declration of such fallcious are the indetification of those fallacies
S.D.

Okay, in your haste to respond, your typing got sloppy. That's fine. But, as near as I can tell, what you meant to say was -

"My declarations of such fallacies are the identification of those fallacies."

First, let me know if that is in fact what you intended to type. IF SO, I'm not sure I understand it. It sounds an awful lot like "They are fallacies because I declare them so." Or perhaps you meant "I have already identified the fallacies in my previous posts." If one of these two interpretations is correct, please let me know. If neither is correct, could you clarify?

In reply to:
"Primarily, it seems people have been arguing that the sign posted wasn't the best way to convince people that atheism is preferable."

you said:

Originally Posted by Sir Dillon

Hence the fallacy of that argument.

Nothing within the statement, context or otherwise, stated that atheism was "the best way" to convince people that "atheism is preferable."

Again, another subjective (and incorrect) interpretation of what was stated.

This is so garbled I can scarcely make out your intent at all. That reply doesn't appear to be addressing the issue (the right for the sign to be there as opposed to the merits of its content), and it's confusing in the bargain. Again, please clarify.

[Alex]

Originally Posted by Not Afraid

ALEX........WHERE ARE YOU???????

I'm here. But I'm thinking I will stick this one out indefinitely. I think the question I would have been pursuing has been settled.

As for the other discussions, I'm sure everybody here knows what I would say well enough that I don't really need to say it. So I'll save it for when it won't be competing with such flamboyance.

[Kevy Baby]

How did jonvn get in here?

[Disneyphile]

Originally Posted by flippyshark

"Also, you keep using the word "fallacious."

I keep reading this as "fellatious", which has an entirely different meaning.

However, it completely changes the context of this whole thread and even makes it a bit funny. So, I think I'll keep reading it as that.

[wendybeth]

My, we have been a busy board today, haven't we?


Pru, thanks for your sentiment but we are all interconnected via friendships through this board, and when someone pisses us off we generally feel free to address the issue without worrying about upsetting others. SD is a big boy and can handle himself, but I do wish that a little settling-in time had taken place before the flame retardant clothing became necessary. SD, these are good people and you really should get to know everyone better (and let them get to know you) before hitting light speed. Everyone else- SD is very cool as well, and I really do think this thread has turned into a wrong foot sort of thing.

I'm going to go drink now.

[BarTopDancer]