![]() |
€uromeinke, FEJ. and Ghoulish Delight RULE!!! NA abides. |
|
![]() |
#1 |
.
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 13,354
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
It does, however, rely on never ever allowing Guam to transition from territory to state. (Just noticed I was sloppy in my quick spreadsheet and my numbers above include Puerto Rico.)
Using the 2 for the smallest method, with Guam in the picture that bumps things up to 3,518 members of the House. Even Wyoming would have six. |
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
8/30/14 - Disneyland -10k or Bust.
|
Quote:
__________________
- Taking it one step at a time.
|
|
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
8/30/14 - Disneyland -10k or Bust.
|
Like this?
![]()
__________________
- Taking it one step at a time.
|
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
.
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 13,354
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
To quantify the overtilt of geography in federal government: Wyoming gets one elected federal position per 174,277 people. Texas (California is not worst off) gets one elected federal position per 703,070 people. Just looking at the House, the best person to congress ratio is Wyoming again at 522,830 people per congressman while Montana has 957,861 for their single congressman. But this skew is more agnostic to rural/urban nature of the state. |
|
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
lost in the fog
|
__________________
Be yourself; everyone else is already taken. - Oscar Wilde |
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |