Hey Gerry, that's a word for that. It's called "bi"

[LSPoorEeyorick]

Originally Posted by SzczerbiakManiac

It matters to those who have a legitimate change of having sex with him or are trying to do so. If GB is Straight, my mo bros need not apply. If he's Gay, my Straight sisters need not apply.

Those who have a legitimate chance of having sex with him can ask him about it when they're making small talk before they start necking. Otherwise, it's all star****er fantasy and it doesn't matter the person's orientation.

Originally Posted by SzczerbiakManiac

It matters to members of a repressed minority if they can point to someone who is successful and say, "Hey look, one of us 'made it'. Good for him/her. Good for us."

It's great to have leaders and public figures who are proud of their particular label. There are many of these for the gay community - I, for one, love the way Neil Patrick Harris phrased his open letter to the world. But GB isn't a leader of your community, because he's openly stating he's not specifically a part of it. I personally think it's OK if people are fluid on the Kinsey scale without being a part of the community. It doesn't mean they're closeted, or repressed, or phobic. Some people see things differently than others, and that's the way it goes.