10-30-2009, 10:44 AM
|
#11
|
Worn Romantic
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Long Beach California
Posts: 8,435
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight
Perhaps not, but we as a society are already perfectly okay with creating different levels of punishment based solely on motive. By your earlier logic, if I shoot someone in the head, my punishment should be no different if I did it because he's some stranger that spilled my beer at a bar and I happened to have my gun on me than if I spent months plotting to kill someone because they hit on my wife once. The actual act is the same, different punishments would amount to punishing thought, no?
Like I said, I don't necessarily think that hate crime legislation is an effective thing to do, but "we can't punish motive because that's being thought-police" isn't a argument against it that holds much water because, well, we already do that with no objection.
Which is why rape carries a stiffer penalty than simple assault. Crimes against children can carry larger penalties than crimes against adults. Domestic violence stronger penalties than punching a guy at a bar. We already have many dividing lines where, as a society, we feel it necessary to make a point of discouraging specific behavior.
|
Thank you GD. You made the exact same points I wanted to make last night, but couldn't (sick computer).
__________________
Unrestrained frivolity will lead to the downfall of modern society.
|
|
Submit to Quotes
|