Conspiracy Theories

Morrigoon · 12-18-2009, 02:47 PM

He's saying that the research wasn't actually using high-fructose corn syrup (which is a glucose-fructose mix), instead it used 100% fructose. So scientifically, the study results can't be applied to HFCS

And he misspelled beet sugar

Alex · 12-18-2009, 02:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Morrigoon

He's saying that the research wasn't actually using high-fructose corn syrup (which is a glucose-fructose mix), instead it used 100% fructose. So scientifically, the study results can't be applied to HFCS.

More specifically they can't be used to differentiate HFCS and regular sugar since they both contain fructose in similar quantities.

If fructose is bad it would suggest that the fructose in HFCS and sucrose are bad as well.

12-18-2009, 02:47 PM	#1
Morrigoon I throw stones at houses Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Location: Location Posts: 9,534	He's saying that the research wasn't actually using high-fructose corn syrup (which is a glucose-fructose mix), instead it used 100% fructose. So scientifically, the study results can't be applied to HFCS And he misspelled beet sugar __________________ http://bash.org/?top "It is useless for sheep to pass a resolution in favor of vegetarianism while wolves remain of a different opinion." -- William Randolph Inge
	Submit to Quotes