Lounge of Tomorrow

€uromeinke, FEJ. and Ghoulish Delight RULE!!! NA abides.  


Go Back   Lounge of Tomorrow > A.S.C.O.T > Lounge Lizard
Swank Swag
FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts Clear Unread

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 08-12-2010, 07:09 PM   #1
scaeagles
I LIKE!
 
scaeagles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,819
scaeagles is the epitome of coolscaeagles is the epitome of coolscaeagles is the epitome of coolscaeagles is the epitome of coolscaeagles is the epitome of coolscaeagles is the epitome of coolscaeagles is the epitome of coolscaeagles is the epitome of coolscaeagles is the epitome of coolscaeagles is the epitome of coolscaeagles is the epitome of cool
I think such a high percentage of the upper middle class have done such a poor job of managing their lives as lower income earners that their income to debt ratio makes their income in effect much smaller. Are they still "rich" because they are in a percentage level? I don't know.

I know DINKs that have lower income than my wife and I do but have far more disposable income because they have no children. I would qualify them as rich long before I would qualify us. We have some good friend who are DINKs who just spent a week in Belize and put a down payment on some property there because they love it. We make more but could never even think of doing that.

I don't think you can define rich by level of income.....I think it has more to do with assets vs. liabilities.
scaeagles is offline   Submit to Quotes Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2010, 09:10 PM   #2
Alex
.
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 13,354
Alex is the epitome of coolAlex is the epitome of coolAlex is the epitome of coolAlex is the epitome of coolAlex is the epitome of coolAlex is the epitome of coolAlex is the epitome of coolAlex is the epitome of coolAlex is the epitome of coolAlex is the epitome of coolAlex is the epitome of cool
Quote:
Originally Posted by scaeagles View Post
I don't think you can define rich by level of income.....I think it has more to do with assets vs. liabilities.
True. But on the other hand if you are making $250,000 a year and have yourself so in debt that you're barely getting by you may no longer be effectively rich but I also don't want to hear the whining about how it really isn't that much money and "woe is I" and all that crap.
Alex is offline   Submit to Quotes Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2010, 07:47 AM   #3
scaeagles
I LIKE!
 
scaeagles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,819
scaeagles is the epitome of coolscaeagles is the epitome of coolscaeagles is the epitome of coolscaeagles is the epitome of coolscaeagles is the epitome of coolscaeagles is the epitome of coolscaeagles is the epitome of coolscaeagles is the epitome of coolscaeagles is the epitome of coolscaeagles is the epitome of coolscaeagles is the epitome of cool
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex View Post
True. But on the other hand if you are making $250,000 a year and have yourself so in debt that you're barely getting by you may no longer be effectively rich but I also don't want to hear the whining about how it really isn't that much money and "woe is I" and all that crap.
Of course. I don't have sympathy, but I don't really regard such a person as rich.

However, I think Trump has said something like he has huge influence with banks because of how much he owes them. I think if you take the amount of debt to huge extremes the pendulum swings back toward rich....or at least living like it.
scaeagles is offline   Submit to Quotes Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:16 PM.


Lunarpages.com Web Hosting

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.