SacTown's Newest Friend

[Ghoulish Delight]

Originally Posted by scaeagles

It should be interesting to see how this plays out.

He is certainly well qualified. Being that he was confirmed to his current position on an appeals court without much opposition and even members of the Clinton administration have signed a letter urging his confirmation (I don't know who - I just read it), I would hope that it won't be long and drawn out. Something tells me it will, though, as it would be with any candidate, sadly.

You know, Clinton is NOT lord and savior of the Democratic Party. He's a charismatic guy who did some good things, but hearing, "Clinton agreed with it, so they all should" is getting old.

[scaeagles]

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight

You know, Clinton is NOT lord and savior of the Democratic Party. He's a charismatic guy who did some good things, but hearing, "Clinton agreed with it, so they all should" is getting old.

It's not the individual comment, it's the fact that he can't go 3 posts without mentioning him. It's old.

Who peed on your cheerios this morning?

Good lord, the whole issue with the nomination process, as put forth by the democrats, is that we need someone who is not a "right wing extremist". My point, should you wish to open your eyes and see it, is that since many involved the most recent democrat administration, associated with who the President was at the time, does not see him as anything close to that. However, Kennedy, Schumer, and other left wing extremists will most certainly try to paint him in a bad light.

Also, my point had nothing to do with Clinton himself if you bother to read it. I don't know and don't care what Bill Clinton thinks of Roberts. I referred to members of the Clinton administration. So get off your condescending high horse.

[SacTown Chronic]

Playing a role in the theft of an election doesn't make him a right-wing extremist? What does he have to do to earn that designation...bomb an abortion clinic?