![]() |
€uromeinke, FEJ. and Ghoulish Delight RULE!!! NA abides. |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
I Floop the Pig
|
Quote:
A related question - what percentage of their intake does that 38% represent?
__________________
'He who receives an idea from me, receives instruction himself without lessening mine; as he who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me.' -TJ |
|
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
.
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 13,354
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Since much of the bottom 50% of income earners is mostly exempt from income taxes that makes sense it would be skewed that way. Of course, this is just federal adjusted gross income (which does tend to skew things to the benefit of the wealthier since they have more ways to adjust their income downward). But federal income tax is progressive, while sales taxes and payroll taxes tend to be regressive and the picture would change (though I don't know how much) if total tax burden were used. Now the problem really is what constitutes "fair share." Personally, I don't care that I'm taxed at a higher rate than most people I know. |
|
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | ||
I Floop the Pig
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
'He who receives an idea from me, receives instruction himself without lessening mine; as he who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me.' -TJ |
||
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |