SacTown's Newest Friend

[SacTown Chronic]

Originally Posted by scaeagles

The middle of the country knows sour grapes when they see them and it just pushes them away from the dems.

Sour grapes? I never supported Al Gore's campaign for president.

Dem? I have never been a registered Democrat and I would have voted for John McCain if the FundiFools, in their never ending search for a savior, hadn't fallen for an immoral turd in righteous clothing during the primaries.

What a bizzare, and scary, time we live in when anyone left of the far far far far right is considered a liberal or a Democrat.

[Nephythys]

Originally Posted by SacTown Chronic

Sour grapes? I never supported Al Gore's campaign for president.

Dem? I have never been a registered Democrat and I would have voted for John McCain if the FundiFools, in their never ending search for a savior, hadn't fallen for an immoral turd in righteous clothing during the primaries.

What a bizzare, and scary, time we live in when anyone left of the far far far far right is considered a liberal or a Democrat.

Registered or not- you kick out their most venomous talking points, conspiracies and attacks as if they are second nature.

[scaeagles]

Originally Posted by SacTown Chronic

Sour grapes? I never supported Al Gore's campaign for president.

What a bizzare, and scary, time we live in when anyone left of the far far far far right is considered a liberal or a Democrat.

OK, I believe you. However, I would suppose that most people who do continue to bring it up are on the far left, such as Soros, Dean, etc. I believe the effect is the same, so it doesn't bother me.

I would agree with your second statement quoted above - however, I consider it sad that someone with great judicial credentials will be attacked by Schumer and Kennedy because he is somewhere right of the far far far far left.

[Scrooge McSam]

Originally Posted by scaeagles

I consider it sad that someone with great judicial credentials will be attacked by Schumer and Kennedy because he is somewhere right of the far far far far left.

Maybe we have a different definition of judicial credentials.

What about his judicial record is so great? He's only been a judge since 2003. True, he's been involved in the business of law for quite a few years, as law clerk, lobbyist and partner. Is that what you find so attractive about him?

[SacTown Chronic]

Originally Posted by Scrooge McSam

Is that what you find so attractive about him?

Well, that and his experience with stealing elections.

*ducks*

[scaeagles]

Originally Posted by Scrooge McSam

Is that what you find so attractive about him?

He has argued many cases before the supreme court, winning a decent percentage.

He has a reputation as a brilliant legal thinker.

He is widely respected by both sides of the political spectrum. More so on the right than on the left, but that's because he is a solid conservative and originalist.

I really don't want to see a huge fight. I get as sick of it as the next guy.

As far as helping steal an election, for those that want someone along the lines of O'Connor, that fits right in, then. Of course, Ted Olson might have been a good choice along those lines, too.