8.8 Quake hits Japan... tsunami warnings issued - Page 9

Morrigoon · 03-15-2011, 08:01 PM

Plus, we're talking about a 30-year old plant. Newer nuclear plants can be built upon more advanced earthquake-safe building standards.

JWBear · 03-15-2011, 08:03 PM

Actually, the plant survived the earthquake without any damage whatsoever. It was the tsunami that caused the problems - by wiping out the back-up generators for the cooling system.

innerSpaceman · 03-15-2011, 09:36 PM

As overblown as it may be here, I imagine it's pretty darn terrifying in Japan.

If such a thing happened here, how likely would you be to believe the government or the utility companies or even the press as to how dangerous the radioactivity heading your way was??

And how would you like to be trying to get out of Los Angeles if there were even credible RUMORS of radioactive clouds headed this way after being traumatized by unfathomable natural disaster life???

Yes, I imagine this is all pretty upsetting in Japan.

Alex · 03-15-2011, 09:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by innerSpaceman

If such a thing happened here, how likely would you be to believe the government or the utility companies or even the press as to how dangerous the radioactivity heading your way was??

Reasonably likely, except for the press. I never trust the press to ever accurately represent risk.

Per Lani, who is able to watch NHK without help, the Japanese press doesn't seem nearly so overwrought though they are definitely giving it plenty of attention.

€uroMeinke · 03-15-2011, 09:49 PM

I'd believe the utility companies

JWBear · 03-15-2011, 10:26 PM

I've been reading the BBC coverage of the situation. Unlike the American press, it's calm, informative, and fact based. Quite refreshing.

Not Afraid · 03-15-2011, 11:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JWBear

I haven't fact checked this yet, but I just read a comment that every nuclear plant in operation saves the burning of about 2 million tons of coal a year. With 442 operating nuclear plants worldwide that's a total of 884 million tons per year. Just think how much mining, waste, and pollution those nukes prevent.

Not to mention the thousands of miners that are killed in coal mining accidents each year.

JWBear · 03-16-2011, 08:14 AM

And the thousands, if not millions, of coal related cancer deaths.

Strangler Lewis · 03-16-2011, 09:13 AM

But what about the coal related folk songs? I suppose Big John would translate to the nuke plant context if he's the one who stays behind to absorb all the radiation, but what about "16 tons" and "Working in a coal mine," etc.?

alphabassettgrrl · 03-16-2011, 10:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex

Per Lani, who is able to watch NHK without help, the Japanese press doesn't seem nearly so overwrought though they are definitely giving it plenty of attention.

Quote:

Originally Posted by JWBear

I've been reading the BBC coverage of the situation. Unlike the American press, it's calm, informative, and fact based. Quite refreshing.

See, it's possible to have good coverage without the hysteria.

I need to check out the BBC; haven't looked at it in a few days.

03-15-2011, 08:01 PM	#81
Morrigoon I throw stones at houses Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Location: Location Posts: 9,534	Plus, we're talking about a 30-year old plant. Newer nuclear plants can be built upon more advanced earthquake-safe building standards. __________________ http://bash.org/?top "It is useless for sheep to pass a resolution in favor of vegetarianism while wolves remain of a different opinion." -- William Randolph Inge
	Submit to Quotes

03-15-2011, 08:03 PM	#82
JWBear Worn Romantic Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Long Beach California Posts: 8,435	Actually, the plant survived the earthquake without any damage whatsoever. It was the tsunami that caused the problems - by wiping out the back-up generators for the cooling system. __________________ Unrestrained frivolity will lead to the downfall of modern society.
	Submit to Quotes

03-15-2011, 09:36 PM	#83
innerSpaceman Kink of Swank Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Inner Space Posts: 13,075	As overblown as it may be here, I imagine it's pretty darn terrifying in Japan. If such a thing happened here, how likely would you be to believe the government or the utility companies or even the press as to how dangerous the radioactivity heading your way was?? And how would you like to be trying to get out of Los Angeles if there were even credible RUMORS of radioactive clouds headed this way after being traumatized by unfathomable natural disaster life??? Yes, I imagine this is all pretty upsetting in Japan.
	Submit to Quotes

03-15-2011, 09:49 PM	#85
€uroMeinke L'Hédoniste Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: A.S.C.O.T. Posts: 8,671	I'd believe the utility companies __________________ I would believe only in a God that knows how to Dance. Friedrich Nietzsche
	Submit to Quotes

03-15-2011, 10:26 PM	#86
JWBear Worn Romantic Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Long Beach California Posts: 8,435	I've been reading the BBC coverage of the situation. Unlike the American press, it's calm, informative, and fact based. Quite refreshing. __________________ Unrestrained frivolity will lead to the downfall of modern society.
	Submit to Quotes

03-16-2011, 08:14 AM	#88
JWBear Worn Romantic Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Long Beach California Posts: 8,435	And the thousands, if not millions, of coal related cancer deaths. __________________ Unrestrained frivolity will lead to the downfall of modern society.
	Submit to Quotes

03-16-2011, 09:13 AM	#89
Strangler Lewis Doing The Job Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: In a state Posts: 3,956	But what about the coal related folk songs? I suppose Big John would translate to the nuke plant context if he's the one who stays behind to absorb all the radiation, but what about "16 tons" and "Working in a coal mine," etc.? __________________ Live now-pay later. Diner's Club!
	Submit to Quotes