Nuclear power and bureaucracy

[innerSpaceman]

Hmmm, I wonder if wind plants make attractive targets for terrorism? Or if coal facilities go practically unprotected against attack?




Get my drift about why nuclear power is unsafe in today's climate, for different reasons than it was in yesterday's climate? In 20 years, it will be unacceptably dangerous for a different reason. Something which has the power to destroy life in such a calamatous manner will NEVER be safe.

[scaeagles]

Originally Posted by innerSpaceman

Hmmm, I wonder if wind plants make attractive targets for terrorism? Or if coal facilities go practically unprotected against attack?

The way I see it is that so much vital stuff in the US is unprotected any power plant is just another target. I know only a bit about how they work, but they cannot be bombed into melt down, though I am certain some radiation could be leaked. Looking at the limits of the explosives the terrorists have at their disposal, however, I have seen no evidence they have enough power to create an explosion large enough to do that.

If we want to talk about scary terrorist targets that are unprotected, let's talk water supply. There is simply no physical way to protect it, and a coordinated attack with the right stuff in the right places could be more crippling than anything else I can imagine.

[€uroMeinke]

Originally Posted by innerSpaceman

Hmmm, I wonder if wind plants make attractive targets for terrorism? Or if coal facilities go practically unprotected against attack?

I can't say about the wind plants, but the coal facilities certainly have had their security beefed up post 9/11. They may lack the gun towers, automatic weapons, and body armour, but they do have armed gaurds patroling the grounds, manning the various check points, and doing thorough vehicle inspections - interior, truck space, engin compartment and under the car.