Alito

scaeagles · 10-31-2005, 11:29 AM

All that does is highlight the inherent ridiculousness of current abortion/paternity law.

If it is the sole choice of the woman whether to allow the "unviable tissue mass" to enter the world as a human being, then it should be her complete and total financial responsibility. Her choice, her responsibility.

I'm not trying to be a jerk. I am not suggesting that men should not be financially responsible for the children they sire. I am simply pointing out what I consider to be inconsistent.

10-31-2005, 11:29 AM	#11
scaeagles I LIKE! Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 7,819	All that does is highlight the inherent ridiculousness of current abortion/paternity law. If it is the sole choice of the woman whether to allow the "unviable tissue mass" to enter the world as a human being, then it should be her complete and total financial responsibility. Her choice, her responsibility. I'm not trying to be a jerk. I am not suggesting that men should not be financially responsible for the children they sire. I am simply pointing out what I consider to be inconsistent.
	Submit to Quotes