100,000 Protestors... Angry mobs of students...

[Scrooge McSam]

Thank you, Wendy.

[Nephythys]

Originally Posted by BarTopDancer

There are so many logical fallicies in that statement. Can you argue without attacking?

I did not attack anyone.

And I will find links....later.

[SacTown Chronic]

Yes, but does voting Democrat mean that you're gay? My family says yes.

[wendybeth]

Originally Posted by SacTown Chronic

Yes, but does voting Democrat mean that you're gay? My family says yes.

You're also a felon, and apparently you're dead as well. Rough party!

[Nephythys]

Interesting way to twist those words...whatever

[Alex]

Originally Posted by wendybeth

Uhm, there's at least one poster here that might beg to differ......

A) I'm being sarcastic.

B) I'm assured by one of my gay friends that no gay person would ever vote Republican that anybody who does is just trying (and failing) to pass as gay. I, of course, don't believe him.

C) In my 3 point post above I when I got around to attacking I was attacking Nephytys's position. (The first part was to show that roughly the same point could be made without being derogatory and create a point around which discussion could proceed, the second part was to highlight the valuelessness of her method, the third part was show focus on the fallacy of her assumption.

[wendybeth]

Originally Posted by Nephythys

Is it possible that it is as simple as- If you make people present ID, and you give them voter cards to make it easier for them- it would then become harder to scream racism and disenfranchisement when the vote doesn't go your way?

That seems like a good reason for black members of congress to walk out- it would make it to hard to try to accuse people of things that weren't happening and try to throw doubt on the vote.

Sorry- Way TOO many of the voter fraud allegations and convictions are against democrats, in democrat controlled districts with democrat's running the show.

Democrats- the party of the dead, the felons and the illegals. No, not EVERY single individual in the party wants it that way- but it is what it is.

Your first statement is a blanket one, which you then soften with a 'not EVERY', but it's a very broad paintbrush being used all the same. Glass houses applies here- both parties have a long history with abusing the voting process.

[wendybeth]

Originally Posted by Alex Stroup

A) I'm being sarcastic.

B) I'm assured by one of my gay friends that no gay person would ever vote Republican that anybody who does is just trying (and failing) to pass as gay. I, of course, don't believe him.

C) In my 3 point post above I when I got around to attacking I was attacking Nephytys's position. (The first part was to show that roughly the same point could be made without being derogatory and create a point around which discussion could proceed, the second part was to highlight the valuelessness of her method, the third part was show focus on the fallacy of her assumption.

I knew you were being sarcastic, Alex! Even if you didn't use a smilie.

[innerSpaceman]

Originally Posted by Nephythys

Democrats- the party of the dead, the felons and the illegals. No, not EVERY single individual in the party wants it that way- but it is what it is.

Were these the words that were twisted?

Careful please. Them's were very close to fightin' words.

[Nephythys]

What is the warning for? What are you going to do to me for being snarky about my view of the democratic party and their illegal voting blocs?

Unless you want to take that somehow personally- they are not fighting words.

Unless you are wanting to pick a fight for the whole democrat party?