The random political thoughts thread (Part Deux)

[Gemini Cricket]

An antigay pogrom is taking place in Iraq. Gratuitous killings of gays are permitted under Iraqi law, and it is a fact that George W. Bush approved the wording of the Iraqi constitution that makes it so. Mainstream U.S. media are not reporting on the plight of Iraqi gays, nor are they discussing how to rescue them. This points out the urgent need for LGBT Americans to participate more in our democracy.

Source


Yeah, I think I'm going on a media diet again...

[Alex]

Originally Posted by scaeagles

Do I think Kerry would spend less? No. I think (and have said it many times here) that Bush spends too much. Way too much. I don't see Kerry being any different.

Kerry would spend less, at least with this Congress. As soon as a Democrat is in the White House, Republicans in Congress would rediscover their fiscally conservative roots. I'm not saying that splitting the branches in opposing parties is a net good (though I think it might be) but when it comes to spending a Democratic president with a Republican congress is probably going to almost always spend less money than a Dem or Rep dominated government.

[scaeagles]

Originally Posted by Alex Stroup

Kerry would spend less, at least with this Congress.

This is true. One thing that I get caught up in is talking about how much Bush spends....well, technically it isn't Bush, as all spending originates in the House. Bush could use his veto pen, certainly. I am irritated with the Republican led House on the spending just as much as I am with Bush.