![]() |
€uromeinke, FEJ. and Ghoulish Delight RULE!!! NA abides. |
![]() |
#691 |
I Floop the Pig
|
Of course, the blurring of the line goes both directions, and that's the objection to the "facts" that btd posted. It's a clear attempt to equate "Hispanics are criminals" to the illegal immigration issue.
Tangentially, the Equal Employment Opportunity Comission lists "Hispanic" as a race.
__________________
'He who receives an idea from me, receives instruction himself without lessening mine; as he who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me.' -TJ |
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |
![]() |
#692 | |
...
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 13,244
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Personally, I find someone who floated here on a raft to be pretty courageous. That's moxie. We should include those people who would do that to get here. My friend goes to Harvard. Her family floated here from Cuba when she was 6 or so on a freakin' raft. What are we supposed to say? 'Darling, you didn't fill out the right forms. You must take your raft and go back?' My friend is an undergrad at Harvard now. She's going to be a brilliant professor in biochemistry someday. Her family busts their butts to pay her tuition... They are legally American now, but initially they weren't. But they were so unhappy with their country that they came here to make a change and they did. To me, it's patrotic to say, 'If you would risk your life to be here, then you should be here.' |
|
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |
![]() |
#693 |
I LIKE!
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,819
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Aren't Cubans automatically given legal status because it is assumed they need political assylum for escaping a communist country?
|
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |
![]() |
#694 | |
...
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 13,244
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |
![]() |
#695 | |
Prepping...
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Here, there, everywhere
Posts: 11,405
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |
![]() |
#696 |
.
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 13,354
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Or perhaps it is just implying that illegal immigrants are criminals. If the numbers were to turn out to be true, would they be racist? Is it not possible to hold the opinion that illegal immigrants are more likely to engage in criminal activities without it being an indictment based on race? I think the poor and marginalized are more likely to be involved in criminal activities regardless of the race category of the poor marginalized people. It just so happens that in illegal immigrants tend to be poor and marginalized and tend to be overwhelmingly Latino.
I don't see that as racist. Also the EEOC only considers "Hispanic" a race by first excluding from the meaning of "hispanic" all the non-Latino Hispanics. So, yes, by defining "hispanic" to mean "latino" then you do get closer to something like a "race." But since there are millions of Asian Hispanics the EEOC is using a non-standard meaning of the word. The U.S. Census does not consider Hispanic a race which is why the EEOC has to provide detailed instructions on how they convert an Ethnicity (Hispanic) into a race (Hispanic). |
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |
![]() |
#697 | |
.
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 13,354
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |
![]() |
#698 | ||
Cruiser of Motorboats
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |
![]() |
#699 | |
...
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 13,244
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
![]() I'm wondering why there would be such a distinction in the rules for people who come here from Cuba vs Mexico (and Haiti for that matter). I mean, we think Communism is wrong but we also think the way Mexico is run is wrong. We draw the line because one is a Communist country? (I'm being more inquisitive and not snarky here... in this post at least.) |
|
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |
![]() |
#700 |
.
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 13,354
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Essentially is a hangover from the Cold War. Nobody really supports it (or the embargo of Cuba) any longer but it can't be changed without appearing soft on Communism.
It is easy to oppose such measures against new countries, harder to actually stand up and say they should be abolished against existing dictators. Vietnamese, Cambodians, and Laotians also had a period where, if they could get here, they were pretty much summarily granted asylum. East Europeans and Russians who managed to defect were also summarily granted asylum. The hook on which these asylum claims is made is that merely the act of trying to leave your home country is grounds for execution if you're returned. If Vicente Fox started firing squads for any nationals returned by the United States then things might change. |
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |