![]() |
€uromeinke, FEJ. and Ghoulish Delight RULE!!! NA abides. |
|
![]() |
|||||||
| View Poll Results: If you, hypothetically, were to select from the following, what would it be? | |||
| More-swanky weeknight reception, because the swankier, the better, yo. |
|
5 | 25.00% |
| Less-swanky weekend reception, because I'd more likely be able to go. |
|
15 | 75.00% |
| Voters: 20. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#11 |
|
.
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 13,354
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I'm always in favor of the just go sign papers downtown, tell your friends months later, and at some point just throw a real big fun party.
But I seem to be in the minority on that one. The first question I guess is what do you want? Do you want a party you'll remember for the ambience or to have as many of your friends and family there as possible. I don't know how many people would go to a weeknight wedding reception (and does that mean a weeknight wedding?) and I have no baseline since I've never had an acquaintance do such a thing where more than a handful of people were invited (the one friend I have who got married on a weekday had a five person wedding party, no invited guests, and then those five people went to dinner). But if expenses are an issue a more intimate smaller party might be advantageous. But really, in my opinion, it comes down first to what is the primary thing about the party: the people or the decoration. |
|
|
Submit to Quotes
|