NO! Chemical weapons in Iraq???

SacTown Chronic · 06-22-2006, 06:40 AM

What was the point? That Saddam is a liar, a coward, and a bully? Fine, I don't know anyone who disputes that.

Explain to me the difference between True Warrior 43 and Saddam.

scaeagles · 06-22-2006, 06:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SacTown Chronic

What was the point? That Saddam is a liar, a coward, and a bully? Fine, I don't know anyone who disputes that.

When someone lies about disposing of chemical weapons when under a cease fire that requires inspections that are not being allowed, then it would seem as if one of the original points for invasion was certainly valid. This is the point.

So as to not be misconstrued, whether WMD are there was never something I thought was a precondition for invasion of Iraq. The first violation of the cease fire was, and those violations included denial of inspections.

Gemini Cricket · 06-22-2006, 07:09 AM

~MS~ · 06-22-2006, 07:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gemini Cricket

just cuz this is so deserving of being repeated

06-22-2006, 06:40 AM	#1
SacTown Chronic the myth of the dream Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 2,217	What was the point? That Saddam is a liar, a coward, and a bully? Fine, I don't know anyone who disputes that. Explain to me the difference between True Warrior 43 and Saddam.
	Submit to Quotes

06-22-2006, 07:09 AM	#3
Gemini Cricket ... Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 13,244
	Submit to Quotes