NY Times and intelligence leaks

innerSpaceman · 06-29-2006, 09:59 PM

Hmmm, I wish I didn't find this story so ho-hum and much adieu, or I might be tempted to check into the facts more.

Alex · 06-29-2006, 10:07 PM

You're of the opinion that the president is in violation of the constitution. That he intends to remain in violation of the constitution, and that all three branches of government so far have no problem with this violation of the constitution and you find it a ho-hum story and much ado about nothing?

innerSpaceman · 06-30-2006, 06:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Stroup

You're of the opinion that the president is in violation of the constitution. That he intends to remain in violation of the constitution, and that all three branches of government so far have no problem with this violation of the constitution and you find it a ho-hum story and much ado about nothing?

Yes, because this story is one of the smallest pieces of the puzzle that assembles into a picture of dictatorship. I was just trying to justify why there is any kind of outcry about the bank transaction surveillance, but it's really a minor spoonful in the pot of Bush's crimes against the Constitution and his sacret oath to defend it.

06-29-2006, 09:59 PM	#1
innerSpaceman Kink of Swank Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Inner Space Posts: 13,075	Hmmm, I wish I didn't find this story so ho-hum and much adieu, or I might be tempted to check into the facts more.
	Submit to Quotes

06-29-2006, 10:07 PM	#2
Alex . Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 13,354	You're of the opinion that the president is in violation of the constitution. That he intends to remain in violation of the constitution, and that all three branches of government so far have no problem with this violation of the constitution and you find it a ho-hum story and much ado about nothing?
	Submit to Quotes