The Dixie Chicks

[wendybeth]

Originally Posted by sleepyjeff

No; and no one said they were.

No, I guess the "you go public, you deal with the consequences" isn't exactly an endorsement of such behaviour, but neither is it a condemnation.

[sleepyjeff]

Originally Posted by wendybeth

No, I guess the "you go public, you deal with the consequences" isn't exactly an endorsement of such behaviour, but neither is it a condemnation.

...but the center point of this discussion was never about the death threats...that was just a side thrown in at the end of one post. Unless the post was quoted(which it wasn't) I don't see why a condemnation would be required. Clearly(at least to me anyway) the "go public and deal" comment was regarding the commercial consequences. Nothing bizzaro about that.

[Nephythys]

Originally Posted by sleepyjeff

...but the center point of this discussion was never about the death threats...that was just a side thrown in at the end of one post. Unless the post was quoted(which it wasn't) I don't see why a condemnation would be required. Clearly(at least to me anyway) the "go public and deal" comment was regarding the commercial consequences. Nothing bizzaro about that.

I'm so glad you're here.

[Nephythys]

Originally Posted by wendybeth

No, I guess the "you go public, you deal with the consequences" isn't exactly an endorsement of such behaviour, but neither is it a condemnation.

Typical assumption.

Because I don't type a condemnation- you assume a negative.

It's beneath me to even answer this.

[wendybeth]

Originally Posted by Nephythys

Typical assumption.

Because I don't type a condemnation- you assume a negative.

It's beneath me to even answer this.

Apparently not, as you just did.

[Nephythys]

Originally Posted by wendybeth

Apparently not, as you just did.

I responded to the post- but not to the ridiculous comment nor the rolling eyes. I don't have to defend a damn thing to any of you- especially when you engage in such nasty commentary.