Dear:

Prudence · 07-14-2006, 04:19 PM

Dear article author:

At the time you submitted your updated article, you had finished your second year of law school. And yet, you cited to the syllabus of a Supreme Court opinion, rather than the actual opinion. The syllabus, which clearly states: "The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader." That means that you, the author, need to find the relevant parts of the actual opinion. You do not cite to the headnotes. I am doing way more work on this S&C than I should be.

I'm really wondering how it is that your article was selected. I'm glad the masthead won't specify which article I worked on.

No love,
Me.

No love

07-14-2006, 04:19 PM	#11
Prudence Beelzeboobs, Esq. Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Gavel - I haz it Posts: 6,287	Dear article author: At the time you submitted your updated article, you had finished your second year of law school. And yet, you cited to the syllabus of a Supreme Court opinion, rather than the actual opinion. The syllabus, which clearly states: "The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader." That means that you, the author, need to find the relevant parts of the actual opinion. You do not cite to the headnotes. I am doing way more work on this S&C than I should be. I'm really wondering how it is that your article was selected. I'm glad the masthead won't specify which article I worked on. No love, Me. No love __________________ traguna macoities tracorum satis de
	Submit to Quotes