Performace art or waste of taxpayers money?

lashbear · 08-18-2006, 04:48 PM

Let the artist perform the piece.
Let the artist (or a benefactor) pay for the cost (not the taxpayers) Maybe the gallery can raise money for the show from sales of pork rinds, barf bags and binoculars ?
As she performs her piece, let the artist remember just how many starving people one pig can feed. There's a lot of good nutrition rotting away there.
As far as PETA goes, the animal was obtained from a slaughterhouse, and was destined to be killed, but I do think the fact that it's not being used for anything productive is a waste. No, I don't find this sort of art productive (or entertaining.)
When viewing a naked woman, 10 minutes is a bit too much time per turn. Your average guy will have finished his game of "Pocket Billiards" in 3 minutes or less.
She has pierced nipples. That explains everything.

08-18-2006, 04:48 PM	#8
lashbear SwishBuckling Bear Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: In Isolation :) Posts: 6,597	Let the artist perform the piece. Let the artist (or a benefactor) pay for the cost (not the taxpayers) Maybe the gallery can raise money for the show from sales of pork rinds, barf bags and binoculars ? As she performs her piece, let the artist remember just how many starving people one pig can feed. There's a lot of good nutrition rotting away there. As far as PETA goes, the animal was obtained from a slaughterhouse, and was destined to be killed, but I do think the fact that it's not being used for anything productive is a waste. No, I don't find this sort of art productive (or entertaining.) When viewing a naked woman, 10 minutes is a bit too much time per turn. Your average guy will have finished his game of "Pocket Billiards" in 3 minutes or less. She has pierced nipples. That explains everything. __________________ *I Heart* my Husband - I can't think of anyone I'd rather be in isolation with.**
	Submit to Quotes