Disney's Dubious Path to 9/11

wendybeth · 09-10-2006, 07:59 PM

I expect them to make as accurate a represention of the commission report as possible, if they insist on using the report as their source of information. I also expect them to not take such dramatic license with people's reputations. The dead cannot defend themselves, but the living sure as hell can and I hope the ones who were misrepresented do something about it.

Scaeagles, you and I both know that you would be hitting the roof were this a liberal attempt at historical revisionism- I've seen too many of your posts railing against the so-called liberal media slant to suppose otherwise.

I think that if Bush is smart, he will mark tomorrow as appropriate- a day of remembering the victims of 9/11. Save the posturing and rhetoric for the day after.

scaeagles · 09-10-2006, 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wendybeth

Scaeagles, you and I both know that you would be hitting the roof were this a liberal attempt at historical revisionism- I've seen too many of your posts railing against the so-called liberal media slant to suppose otherwise.

No doubt. And everyone here would be downplaying it as me freaking out about nothing, or giving their slant on why it wasn't historical revisionism at all.

The one thing I will give you and everyone else is that if they are claiming the 9/11 report is their source then they should stick to it to the letter. I will say that I do not regard that report as much more than a CYA for EVERYONE.

wendybeth · 09-10-2006, 10:27 PM

The old 'two wrongs don't make it right, but it damn sure makes it even' argument, eh?

I didn't like it much after the OJ verdict, and I like it even less now. I'd be curious to see where you might show me an example of such behavior on my part, Scaeagles. I truly do apologise if I have ever done so. I am one of those really naive people that usually dislike such things, no matter what the source.

09-10-2006, 07:59 PM	#1
wendybeth Nevermind Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 7,847	I expect them to make as accurate a represention of the commission report as possible, if they insist on using the report as their source of information. I also expect them to not take such dramatic license with people's reputations. The dead cannot defend themselves, but the living sure as hell can and I hope the ones who were misrepresented do something about it. Scaeagles, you and I both know that you would be hitting the roof were this a liberal attempt at historical revisionism- I've seen too many of your posts railing against the so-called liberal media slant to suppose otherwise. I think that if Bush is smart, he will mark tomorrow as appropriate- a day of remembering the victims of 9/11. Save the posturing and rhetoric for the day after. __________________
	Submit to Quotes

09-10-2006, 10:27 PM	#3
wendybeth Nevermind Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 7,847	The old 'two wrongs don't make it right, but it damn sure makes it even' argument, eh? I didn't like it much after the OJ verdict, and I like it even less now. I'd be curious to see where you might show me an example of such behavior on my part, Scaeagles. I truly do apologise if I have ever done so. I am one of those really naive people that usually dislike such things, no matter what the source. __________________
	Submit to Quotes