Yes, we can. - Page 288

Morrigoon · 01-19-2009, 12:12 PM

Well, damned if you do, damned if you don't. Is he wasting money, or pouring money into the economy? Six of one these days...

Alex · 01-20-2009, 07:56 AM

You're moving the goalposts. If you said it so simply to start, I'd have no real issue. I still don't think you're quite accurately describing the objections over cost (they weren't simply financial). But it is the inclusion of fraudulent supporting facts that prompted argument.

Also, I have no issue with National Review nor Media Matters nor Fox News nor Instapundit. When they present sourced facts they present positions that can be rationally debated. When they don't, then they can't be. But simply being from one of those sources does not make facts any less. I'm sorry you filter yourself only to sources you perceive will slant the facts to your preference.

scaeagles · 01-20-2009, 08:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex

Also, I have no issue with National Review nor Media Matters nor Fox News nor Instapundit. When they present sourced facts they present positions that can be rationally debated. When they don't, then they can't be. But simply being from one of those sources does not make facts any less. I'm sorry you filter yourself only to sources you perceive will slant the facts to your preference.

I never claimed that you have problems with any source per se. However, many posters call Fox News Faux News because of they perceive a bias. I am letting it be known that I have always felt the same about Media Matters. In the same way that anything that comes from Fox is doubted by many here, I admittedly have the same doubts about MM.

Alex · 01-20-2009, 10:31 AM

I'm apparently feeling harsh today. The fact that I have twice posted and then felt I should come back and remove or soften what I've said is strong indicator that today shouldn't be an internet day for me.

So I'm pancaking this and will move on.

Kevy Baby · 01-20-2009, 11:03 AM

Wolf Blitzer and Keith Olbermann are locked in a fierce battle to show who is the bigger idiot.

Right now my money is on Wolf for "And to all a good night" as Bush's helicopter was circling.

Cadaverous Pallor · 01-21-2009, 08:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kevy Baby

Wolf Blitzer and Keith Olbermann are locked in a fierce battle to show who is the bigger idiot.

Right now my money is on Wolf for "And to all a good night" as Bush's helicopter was circling.

I believe that was Keith, actually.

Tom · 01-21-2009, 08:04 AM

You know you've wanted it. Now it's here:

Chia Obama

Cadaverous Pallor · 01-21-2009, 08:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tom

You know you've wanted it. Now it's here:

Chia Obama

Heh, looks more like this Obama:

Snowflake · 01-21-2009, 09:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tom

You know you've wanted it. Now it's here:

Chia Obama

OMG, I'm so ashamed, Joseph Enterprises is one of our long standing clients.

Happily, I do not do their work, but UGH, that's just awful and silly and more than a little creepy.

bewitched · 01-21-2009, 10:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snowflake

OMG, I'm so ashamed, Joseph Enterprises is one of our long standing clients.

Happily, I do not do their work, but UGH, that's just awful and silly and more than a little creepy.

Yet strangely, I kinda want one.

01-19-2009, 12:12 PM	#1
Morrigoon I throw stones at houses Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Location: Location Posts: 9,534	Well, damned if you do, damned if you don't. Is he wasting money, or pouring money into the economy? Six of one these days... __________________ http://bash.org/?top "It is useless for sheep to pass a resolution in favor of vegetarianism while wolves remain of a different opinion." -- William Randolph Inge
	Submit to Quotes

01-20-2009, 07:56 AM	#2
Alex . Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 13,354	You're moving the goalposts. If you said it so simply to start, I'd have no real issue. I still don't think you're quite accurately describing the objections over cost (they weren't simply financial). But it is the inclusion of fraudulent supporting facts that prompted argument. Also, I have no issue with National Review nor Media Matters nor Fox News nor Instapundit. When they present sourced facts they present positions that can be rationally debated. When they don't, then they can't be. But simply being from one of those sources does not make facts any less. I'm sorry you filter yourself only to sources you perceive will slant the facts to your preference. Last edited by Alex : 01-20-2009 at 08:12 AM.
	Submit to Quotes

01-20-2009, 10:31 AM	#4
Alex . Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 13,354	I'm apparently feeling harsh today. The fact that I have twice posted and then felt I should come back and remove or soften what I've said is strong indicator that today shouldn't be an internet day for me. So I'm pancaking this and will move on. Last edited by Alex : 01-20-2009 at 11:03 AM.
	Submit to Quotes

01-20-2009, 11:03 AM	#5
Kevy Baby Chowder Head Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Yes Posts: 18,500	Wolf Blitzer and Keith Olbermann are locked in a fierce battle to show who is the bigger idiot. Right now my money is on Wolf for "And to all a good night" as Bush's helicopter was circling. __________________ The thing about quotes on the internet is that you cannot verify their validity. - Abraham Lincoln
	Submit to Quotes

01-21-2009, 08:04 AM	#7
Tom Valued member Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 541	You know you've wanted it. Now it's here: Chia Obama
	Submit to Quotes