Yes, we can.

Ghoulish Delight · 02-09-2008, 12:33 AM

By endorsing neither, Edwards is obviously trying to position himself to be the eventual winner's VP. I agree with an earlier post elsewhere that Richardson makes a lot more sense as a VP choice for either. Edwards just isn't distinct enough to add anything to the ticket.

mousepod · 02-09-2008, 12:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight

By endorsing neither, Edwards is obviously trying to position himself to be the eventual winner's VP. I agree with an earlier post elsewhere that Richardson makes a lot more sense as a VP choice for either. Edwards just isn't distinct enough to add anything to the ticket.

I doubt he winds up on the ticket. I'm betting he's hedging his bets until he can back the winner - then he'll probably get Attorney General or some other equally powerful cabinet post.

02-09-2008, 12:33 AM	#1
Ghoulish Delight I Floop the Pig Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Alternative Swankstyle Posts: 19,348	By endorsing neither, Edwards is obviously trying to position himself to be the eventual winner's VP. I agree with an earlier post elsewhere that Richardson makes a lot more sense as a VP choice for either. Edwards just isn't distinct enough to add anything to the ticket. __________________ 'He who receives an idea from me, receives instruction himself without lessening mine; as he who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me.' -TJ
	Submit to Quotes