Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows - Page 3

Cadaverous Pallor · 07-03-2007, 01:49 PM

I'm number 15 on the list.....which means I'll probably have a copy waiting for me day of.

I think we bought more than that last time...

Alex · 07-03-2007, 01:52 PM

Keith Olbermann spent a full 8 minutes of his show last week detailing what he thought was the only logical conclusion to the series. Y'all know I couldn't easily care less about Harry Potter but I found it a compelling argument.

So I'm going to just assume he is right and leave it at that (fortunately for me Lani hasn't yet expressed any interest in seeing the next movie).

Snowflake · 07-03-2007, 01:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex

Keith Olbermann spent a full 8 minutes of his show last week detailing what he thought was the only logical conclusion to the series. Y'all know I couldn't easily care less about Harry Potter but I found it a compelling argument.

So I'm going to just assume he is right and leave it at that (fortunately for me Lani hasn't yet expressed any interest in seeing the next movie).

I saw that last week, as well. I thought it was pretty good, too.

Morrigoon · 07-03-2007, 02:05 PM

As far as logical conclusion... I have a suspicion that Harry might be one of Voldemort's horcruxes.

blueerica · 07-03-2007, 02:33 PM

Interesting thought, Morrigoon. However, mustn't there be an incantation to go along with it? And if Harry is the horcrux, then by trying to kill him, is he trying to die?

Interesting thought. I wonder if a horcrux could be accidental.

Morrigoon · 07-03-2007, 03:36 PM

That's what I think. I think in trying to commit the act of killing Harry and failing, V. split himself again and left some of that in Harry - hence their "connection" and Harry's unusual power.

Alex · 07-03-2007, 04:16 PM

From Keith Olbermann:

Spoiler:

If you want to see his whole theory, you can view it here.

lashbear · 07-12-2007, 07:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex

From Keith Olbermann:

Spoiler:

If you want to see his whole theory, you can view it here.

Well, considering that his captioning has the first movie labelled as the "Sorcerers Tome"

Edited to add: It looks like the caption stays throughout the story, therefore must be the name of the spot. Sorry.

Cadaverous Pallor · 07-03-2007, 06:52 PM

Keith Olbermann didn't come up with that. Since the horcrux concept was introduced, fans everywhere have been saying that.

Keith Olberman read some fan fic sites and pretended it was his concept to Muggles everywhere. That's some evil genius right there.

Alex · 07-03-2007, 07:15 PM

Either way, seems solid enough for me and odds are the finale will be lame (simply because almost all finales in multi-volume epic fantasy series end up being lame) so I'm good with assuming it is correct.

07-03-2007, 01:49 PM	#1
Cadaverous Pallor ohhhh baby Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Parental Bliss Posts: 12,364	I'm number 15 on the list.....which means I'll probably have a copy waiting for me day of. I think we bought more than that last time... __________________ The second star to the right shines in the night for you
	Submit to Quotes

07-03-2007, 01:52 PM	#2
Alex . Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 13,354	Keith Olbermann spent a full 8 minutes of his show last week detailing what he thought was the only logical conclusion to the series. Y'all know I couldn't easily care less about Harry Potter but I found it a compelling argument. So I'm going to just assume he is right and leave it at that (fortunately for me Lani hasn't yet expressed any interest in seeing the next movie).
	Submit to Quotes

07-03-2007, 02:05 PM	#4
Morrigoon I throw stones at houses Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Location: Location Posts: 9,534	As far as logical conclusion... I have a suspicion that Harry might be one of Voldemort's horcruxes. __________________ http://bash.org/?top "It is useless for sheep to pass a resolution in favor of vegetarianism while wolves remain of a different opinion." -- William Randolph Inge
	Submit to Quotes

07-03-2007, 02:33 PM	#5
blueerica Nueve Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 6,497	Interesting thought, Morrigoon. However, mustn't there be an incantation to go along with it? And if Harry is the horcrux, then by trying to kill him, is he trying to die? Interesting thought. I wonder if a horcrux could be accidental. __________________ Tomorrow is the day for you and me
	Submit to Quotes

07-03-2007, 03:36 PM	#6
Morrigoon I throw stones at houses Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Location: Location Posts: 9,534	That's what I think. I think in trying to commit the act of killing Harry and failing, V. split himself again and left some of that in Harry - hence their "connection" and Harry's unusual power. __________________ http://bash.org/?top "It is useless for sheep to pass a resolution in favor of vegetarianism while wolves remain of a different opinion." -- William Randolph Inge
	Submit to Quotes

07-03-2007, 04:16 PM	#7
Alex . Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 13,354	From Keith Olbermann: Spoiler: His position is that Harry's scar is the horcrux. If you want to see his whole theory, you can view it here.
	Submit to Quotes

07-03-2007, 06:52 PM	#9
Cadaverous Pallor ohhhh baby Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Parental Bliss Posts: 12,364	Keith Olbermann didn't come up with that. Since the horcrux concept was introduced, fans everywhere have been saying that. Keith Olberman read some fan fic sites and pretended it was his concept to Muggles everywhere. That's some evil genius right there. __________________ The second star to the right shines in the night for you
	Submit to Quotes

07-03-2007, 07:15 PM	#10
Alex . Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 13,354	Either way, seems solid enough for me and odds are the finale will be lame (simply because almost all finales in multi-volume epic fantasy series end up being lame) so I'm good with assuming it is correct.
	Submit to Quotes