![]() |
€uromeinke, FEJ. and Ghoulish Delight RULE!!! NA abides. |
![]() |
#1 |
I LIKE!
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,819
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Bin Laden offers "truce"
A short while ago (30 minutes or so) Al Jazeera aired a tape of (supposedly) Osama himself.
Osama has offered a "truce' to allow for the rebuilding of Afghanistan and Iraq. I found that to be interesting considering we are rebuilding and the terrorists are blowing things up. If this was, in fact, Osama, I suspect this comes from a position of weakness. If anyone thinks Osama is interested in peace they are....well...not thinking clearly. I would suspect he wants time to rebuild much of his scattered and weakened Al Qaeda network, and perhaps give himself time to acquire WMD from, say, Iran. It will be interesting to see how quickly Pelosi and Kennedy and whomever come out and show support for this. I think it would be a huge mistake. The war on terror does not end with a truce. Osama's beliefs prevent peaceful coexistance. |
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
It's Peanut Butter Jelly Time!!!
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Introspection Intersection
Posts: 1,207
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thanks, scaeagles! I just read the story here:
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationwo...home-headlines I'm going to be brutally honest. While I read the story, all I could think was, "He's much like a cockroach. Probably in many respects, but I mean in the sense that he JUST WON'T DIE." That muthertrucker will outlive us all. ![]() |
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Cruiser of Motorboats
|
Quote:
I'm glad you don't think we should accept a truce with Bin Laden. Neither do I. To suggest that those on the liberal side of the spectrum want this is something I have seen zero evidence of. Maybe you have some? |
|
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
I LIKE!
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,819
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I believe it based on their calls to bring troops home from Iraq immediately. This is what bin Laden is asking for - the removal of troops from Iraq and Afghanistan.
It is not a jump in logic to think that Murtha, for example, in his calls for immediate withdrawal from the region, would support the truce as a way to bring them home. It would be, of course, a stupid thing to do. He wants a truce to allow his forces to reorganize in the region. But I do think that many on the left such as i have mentioned will fall for it. |
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Cruiser of Motorboats
|
I think there are more on the left that are able to tell the difference between Bin Laden and Iraq than you are willing to give credit. I would suggest that there are many, many people who want us out of Iraq but think that we should still pursue Bin Laden. We can do one without the other.
Also, I don't recall hearing Murtha say that we should pull troops out of Afghanistan. I'll bet you your next appliance that there will be no democrats supporting a truce. |
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
I LIKE!
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,819
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
MBC, why do you suppose he has called for a truce?
If it is out of concern for the people of Iraq and Afghanistan, then he would call for the end to suicide bombings and the like in the region. Instead, he suggests those who are doing the rebuilding leave. Why is that? He says he wants those regions to be rebuilt, yet wants the rebuilders to go. This tells me something - Iraq IS part of the war on terror. Osama wants us out. I do not believe he wants that for the benefit of the people of Iraq. It is for his benefit. It is because he does not want free nations in that part of the world. He knows the war and freedom coming from it are damaging to him and his goals. True - Murtha has not called for withdrawal from Afghanistan. My apologies. So....Osama is playing to the left. He is simply calling for what they want - at least in part - which is the pullout of troops from Iraq. I hope you are right, but there will be those who will spin it as a way to spare American lives and the lives of citizens in Iraq. While some lives may be saved, many more will be lost in the long run should it happen. |
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
the myth of the dream
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,217
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In 2001 Osama Bin Laden masterminded the destruction of the World Trade Center and forced the President of the United States of America to sit in a Florida classroom with piss running down his leg while he looked around for his mommy.
Several days later Karl Rove and Dick Cheney somehow found Bush's shriveled nut sack and yanked it back into place. Bush walked tough and talked tough. Bin Laden would be brought to justice -- dead or alive. Now, in 2006, Bin Laden is still free to make his pathetic little videos. Unfvckingbelievable! Bush is a complete and total failure. Everything he touches turns to shiit and there are more terrorists running around on this planet than ever before. And as an added bonus, thanks to Dubya McNasty, they are now being trained in urban warfare in Iraq. Yet we are supposed to believe that Bin Laden is now in a position weakness. Are you freaking kidding me?!? Bush has been Bin Laden's Recruiter of the Year for three years running. These are the salad days of terrorism, baby.
__________________
Is it the fingers, or the brain that you're teaching a lesson? |
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |||
Cruiser of Motorboats
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Nevermind
|
He's either called for truce because he's weak and needs to regroup, or he is about to do something really awful and wants to pretend like we forced his hand. Either way, it doesn't matter. He'll do what he will, and so shall we. I have never thought that going after Bin Laden was a bad thing, it's just where we seem to be 'looking' that has me concerned. A truce would imply that a state of war exists between them and us, whereas I was under the impression that they were merely murderous thugs and outlaws. Now that I think about it, was that ever clarified at Gitmo? Are they considered wartime enemies or international outlaws?
But no, there should be no acknowledgement of his 'offer' whatsoever. The pig doesn't deserve a response- to do so would only add legitimacy to his group. |
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
I LIKE!
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,819
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
He is most certainly playing. He is playing to the Arab community in trying to make it seem like he wants the destruction and bombings in their backyard to stop, and he is playing to the left in this country by offering a sham peace in order to give himself time. He completely understands American politics. |
|
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |