Premiere Magazine's 50 Greatest Movie Stars Of All Time

MerryPrankster · 03-26-2005, 08:02 AM

50 - Brad Pitt
49 - Russell Crowe
48 - Nicole Kidman
47 - Johnny Depp
46 - Meryl Streep
45 - Jack Lemmon
44 - Will Smith
43 - Clint Eastwood
42 - Gary Cooper
41 - Peter Sellers
40 - Elizabeth Taylor
39 - Denzel Washington
38 - Robert De Niro
37 - Al Pacino
36 - Sean Connery
35 - Harrison Ford
34 - Rita Hayworth
33 - Shirley Temple
32 - Jane Fonda
31 - Steve McQueen
30 - James Dean
29 - Warren Beatty
28 - Tom Hanks
27 - Gregory Peck
26 - Errol Flynn
25 - Bette Davis
24 - Doris Day
23 - Fred Astaire
22 - Judy Garland
21 - Clark Gable
20 - Sidney Poitier
19 - Spencer Tracy
18 - Audrey Hepburn
17 - Robert Redford
16 - Jack Nicholson
15 - Marlon Brando
14 - Katherine Hepburn
13 - Humphrey Bogart
12 - Grace Kelly
11 - James Cagney
10 - Henry Fonda
09 - James Stewart
08 - Greta Garbo
07 - Julia Roberts
06 - Paul Newman
05 - Ingrid Bergman
04 - John Wayne
03 - Tom Cruise
02 - Marilyn Monroe
01 - Cary Grant

So what do you think? Both Julia Roberts and Tom Cruise surprised me...#7 and #3???

You can vote for your top 5 stars of all time at www.Premiere.com until April 14th. They'll publish the results online on April 15th.

Prudence · 03-26-2005, 05:27 PM

Julia Roberts ranked higher than either Hepburn? It's insanity.

Not Afraid · 03-26-2005, 06:51 PM

The first 15 are sure messed up! Here's my re-do. It's too much to take on the rest but, as much as I adore Grace Kelly, she, in NO way, is a better actor than Katherine Hepburn. As for Roberst - What ARE they thinking?

I also have a problem with Bette Davis placed at 55.

99 - Julia Roberts
51 - Tom Cruise
13 - Audrey Hepburn
12 - Humphrey Bogart
11 - James Cagney
10 - Greta Garbo
09 - Grace Kelly
08 - Paul Newman
07 - John Wayne
06 - Henry Fonda
05 - James Stewart
04 - Marilyn Monroe
03 - Ingrid Bergman
02 - Katherine Hepburn
01 - Cary Grant

Motorboat Cruiser · 03-27-2005, 10:25 AM

Will Smith is between Jack Lemmon and Clint Eastwood? Robert Di Nero is 5 places behind Shirley Temple? No Charlie Chaplin, no Gene Hackman?

I really think not.

And Tom Cruise couldn't act is way out of a paper bag. Just my humble opinion though.

wendybeth · 03-27-2005, 10:41 AM

My humble opinion agrees with yours, MBC.

Whacked out list- I disagree with the placement and lack of placement of so many..... Julia Roberts is an okay actress, but she is not the artist that Davis, Hepburn and so many others were.

03-26-2005, 08:02 AM	#1
MerryPrankster Swanky Panky! Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Hell's Kitchen Posts: 541	Premiere Magazine's 50 Greatest Movie Stars Of All Time 50 - Brad Pitt 49 - Russell Crowe 48 - Nicole Kidman 47 - Johnny Depp 46 - Meryl Streep 45 - Jack Lemmon 44 - Will Smith 43 - Clint Eastwood 42 - Gary Cooper 41 - Peter Sellers 40 - Elizabeth Taylor 39 - Denzel Washington 38 - Robert De Niro 37 - Al Pacino 36 - Sean Connery 35 - Harrison Ford 34 - Rita Hayworth 33 - Shirley Temple 32 - Jane Fonda 31 - Steve McQueen 30 - James Dean 29 - Warren Beatty 28 - Tom Hanks 27 - Gregory Peck 26 - Errol Flynn 25 - Bette Davis 24 - Doris Day 23 - Fred Astaire 22 - Judy Garland 21 - Clark Gable 20 - Sidney Poitier 19 - Spencer Tracy 18 - Audrey Hepburn 17 - Robert Redford 16 - Jack Nicholson 15 - Marlon Brando 14 - Katherine Hepburn 13 - Humphrey Bogart 12 - Grace Kelly 11 - James Cagney 10 - Henry Fonda 09 - James Stewart 08 - Greta Garbo 07 - Julia Roberts 06 - Paul Newman 05 - Ingrid Bergman 04 - John Wayne 03 - Tom Cruise 02 - Marilyn Monroe 01 - Cary Grant So what do you think? Both Julia Roberts and Tom Cruise surprised me...#7 and #3??? You can vote for your top 5 stars of all time at www.Premiere.com until April 14th. They'll publish the results online on April 15th. __________________ My advice to the women of America is to raise more hell and fewer dahlias. ~~ William Allen White
	Submit to Quotes

03-26-2005, 05:27 PM	#2
Prudence Beelzeboobs, Esq. Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Gavel - I haz it Posts: 6,287	Julia Roberts ranked higher than either Hepburn? It's insanity. __________________ traguna macoities tracorum satis de
	Submit to Quotes

03-27-2005, 10:25 AM	#4
Motorboat Cruiser Cruiser of Motorboats Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: So Cal Posts: 3,665	Will Smith is between Jack Lemmon and Clint Eastwood? Robert Di Nero is 5 places behind Shirley Temple? No Charlie Chaplin, no Gene Hackman? I really think not. And Tom Cruise couldn't act is way out of a paper bag. Just my humble opinion though.
	Submit to Quotes

03-27-2005, 10:41 AM	#5
wendybeth Nevermind Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 7,847	My humble opinion agrees with yours, MBC. Whacked out list- I disagree with the placement and lack of placement of so many..... Julia Roberts is an okay actress, but she is not the artist that Davis, Hepburn and so many others were. __________________
	Submit to Quotes

03-26-2005, 06:51 PM	#3
Not Afraid HI! Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 17,108	The first 15 are sure messed up! Here's my re-do. It's too much to take on the rest but, as much as I adore Grace Kelly, she, in NO way, is a better actor than Katherine Hepburn. As for Roberst - What ARE they thinking? I also have a problem with Bette Davis placed at 55. 99 - Julia Roberts 51 - Tom Cruise 13 - Audrey Hepburn 12 - Humphrey Bogart 11 - James Cagney 10 - Greta Garbo 09 - Grace Kelly 08 - Paul Newman 07 - John Wayne 06 - Henry Fonda 05 - James Stewart 04 - Marilyn Monroe 03 - Ingrid Bergman 02 - Katherine Hepburn 01 - Cary Grant
	Submit to Quotes