![]()  | 
	€uromeinke, FEJ. and Ghoulish Delight RULE!!! NA abides.  | 
		
			
  | 	
![]()  | 
	
	
		
		|||||||
| 
		 | 
	Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes | 
| 		
			
			 | 
		#19 | |
| 
			
			
			
			 Chowder Head 
			
		
			
				
			
			
			Join Date: Jan 2005 
				Location: Yes 
				
				
					Posts: 18,500
				 
				
				![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()  | 
	
	
	
	
		
		
		
		 Quote: 
	
 Yes, the choice of a 10-year-old cannot be compared to the choice of a 36-year-old (remember, this incident took place in 1983). Yes, as a 36YO, he would presumably have more wisdom. But at worst I call this a lapse in judgment. 24 years ago! It is not as if he dragged the dog (a la "Vacation" as the linked story compares this incident to). I wouldn't even call the action "cruel" - just bad judgment. To call him an asshole because of one incident (that has nothing to do with his ability to be President) 24 years ago is a stretch. The act may have been idiotic, but it does not make him an asshole. Further, was it Mitt's decision to put the dog on the roof - could it have been say a touchy MIL (pure illustrative speculation on my part) refusing to ride in the car with the dog? Let me ask this: does this act of 24 years ago have an impact on his ability to be president in 2009? 
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
	
	The thing about quotes on the internet is that you cannot verify their validity. 
			- Abraham Lincoln  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
Submit to Quotes 
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
			
		
	 | 
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread | 
| Display Modes | |
		
  | 
	
		
  |