![]() |
€uromeinke, FEJ. and Ghoulish Delight RULE!!! NA abides. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
avatar transition
|
Quote:
__________________
And now Harry, let us step into the night and pursue that flighty temptress, adventure! - Albus Dumbledore |
|
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Chowder Head
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Yes
Posts: 18,500
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Yes, the choice of a 10-year-old cannot be compared to the choice of a 36-year-old (remember, this incident took place in 1983). Yes, as a 36YO, he would presumably have more wisdom. But at worst I call this a lapse in judgment. 24 years ago! It is not as if he dragged the dog (a la "Vacation" as the linked story compares this incident to). I wouldn't even call the action "cruel" - just bad judgment. To call him an asshole because of one incident (that has nothing to do with his ability to be President) 24 years ago is a stretch. The act may have been idiotic, but it does not make him an asshole. Further, was it Mitt's decision to put the dog on the roof - could it have been say a touchy MIL (pure illustrative speculation on my part) refusing to ride in the car with the dog? Let me ask this: does this act of 24 years ago have an impact on his ability to be president in 2009?
__________________
The thing about quotes on the internet is that you cannot verify their validity.
- Abraham Lincoln |
|
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
ohhhh baby
|
Quote:
He will continue to be guilty of cruelty to an animal to the day he dies.
__________________
The second star to the right shines in the night for you |
|
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||
Chowder Head
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Yes
Posts: 18,500
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
And without a non-slanted article (sorry, but the linked article is slanted), there is not enough information to make a better determination of the situation. I am wondering if some here would be as up in arms had this person been a Democratic candidate? ETA: From the article linked in the article: Quote:
__________________
The thing about quotes on the internet is that you cannot verify their validity.
- Abraham Lincoln |
||
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | ||
ohhhh baby
|
Windshield or not, I'm sure it was a horrific journey for that pet.
Quote:
Quote:
On a somewhat related note - a lady came into the library today pushing a dog in a stroller. And not a regular stroller, no, a strollerdesigned to carry dogs. She was told not to bring the pet in and she pitched a fit, calling the librarian prejudiced (and, reportedly, a slut - I wasn't there for this). I personally think this lady is insane. I think only a disabled dog should be pushed around like a baby, and even so, should not be brought into a public building unless it's a helper dog. I also never said anything about being eligible for the presidency. Hell, I come from another planet where being a liar would disqualify you, but in this world, that just ain't the case. I don't pretend to understand what flies and what doesn't in our political system.
__________________
The second star to the right shines in the night for you |
||
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
.
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 13,354
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
.
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 13,354
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Is there any evidence in that story that the dog was treated cruelly? If there was elsewhere then I'll revise my view.
Putting a dog in a carrier and then tying it to the roof of a car does not strike me (assuming sufficient wind protection which isn't mentioned one way or another in the linked story) as any more cruel than putting the carrier in the bed of a pickup truck, which is legal and done all of the time. Plus, the social standards for what is "cruel" treatment of pets has changed a lot over the last 25 years. In many placing trimming tails is now cruel but was once common. Declawing cats is now illegal in quite a few places but is still commonly done. In another 25 years if the societal consensus is that declawing is cruel will the people who do it now be ineligible for the presidency on grounds of animal cruelty? Hell, 25 years ago none of the kids were likely buckled in. Is that a knock against him too? Was he an unfit parent? No, there isn't necessarily an expiration date on cruelty but there are certainly broad and sometimes rapid shifts in what is considered cruel. (And I haven't yet seen anything that would necessarily fall into that category by a current standard, let alone the standards of 1982.) |
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | ||
Chowder Head
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Yes
Posts: 18,500
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
The thing about quotes on the internet is that you cannot verify their validity.
- Abraham Lincoln |
||
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |