![]() |
€uromeinke, FEJ. and Ghoulish Delight RULE!!! NA abides. |
![]() |
#11 |
I LIKE!
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,819
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Fair question, Moonliner, and it has no simple or quick answer. I will when I have more time (as in not at work).
ISM, here's a news flash for you. For the tax year 2006.... Top 1% of wage earners (above $388,000) paid 39.89% of all federal income taxes. Top 5% of wage earners (aggregate with the 1%, above $153,000) paid 60.14% of all federal income taxes. The top 10% paid 70.79%, the top 25% paid 86.27%. The bottom 50% paid 2.99%. Being that this is the case, how can it be said that the top wage earners are not paying enough, or that the taxes from the middle class has been a redistribution of wealth from the middle to the rich? |
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|