![]() |
€uromeinke, FEJ. and Ghoulish Delight RULE!!! NA abides. |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |||
|
ohhhh baby
|
I'll readily admit that some of this thread is flying right over my head (Aristotle? Jim Jackman?) but as usual I don't care enough about a Daily Grind thread to actually look things up.
Quote:
Any "gift", no matter how small or incidental, completely negates the concept of equal representation for all, no matter how the rep ends up voting. This is my solid stance on the profession. If lobbying actually was "just talking", I'd have no problem with it. Quote:
Quote:
__________________
The second star to the right shines in the night for you |
|||
|
|
Submit to Quotes
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Go Hawks Go!
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Parkrose
Posts: 2,632
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Me too....not just this thread either. All of the Daily Grind has been flying over my head for the last couple of days ![]()
__________________
River Guardian-less |
|
|
|
Submit to Quotes
|
|
|
#3 |
|
.
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 13,354
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I know 13 people employed as lobbyists (Government Relations) at work (). If they're doing anything that isn't available to me or you (though certainly in a much more dedicated fashion) then they hide it well.
Yes, there are bad lobbyists (though not possible without bad politicians) but in my experience they are not even close to the majority. But even if they were, there are so many lobbyists with such conflicting goals, unless the politician in question was already sympathetic to one view or another they'd probably just end up cancelling each other out. Again though, if the entire profession should be barred, how do you draw the line to do so? |
|
|
Submit to Quotes
|