Lounge of Tomorrow

€uromeinke, FEJ. and Ghoulish Delight RULE!!! NA abides.  


Go Back   Lounge of Tomorrow > Squaresville > Daily Grind
Swank Swag
FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts Clear Unread

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 08-18-2006, 11:04 AM   #1
Nephythys
Yeah, that's about it-
 
Nephythys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In a state of constant crap to get done
Posts: 2,688
Nephythys is the epitome of coolNephythys is the epitome of coolNephythys is the epitome of coolNephythys is the epitome of coolNephythys is the epitome of coolNephythys is the epitome of coolNephythys is the epitome of coolNephythys is the epitome of coolNephythys is the epitome of coolNephythys is the epitome of coolNephythys is the epitome of cool
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Stroup
It isn't an issue of opinion but of fact. Read the dang opinion.



Bolding mine.

The statutory law with which the judge finds the government out of compliance is FISA (see page 28, 31 of the PDF). The finding is that the government has intentionally tried to circumvent FISA. That if anybody isn't showing respect for FISA it is the president of the United States.

I clearly misread something on another site- gonna look at it more before commenting again on it.

Though I still stand by denial of the stuff posted by JWBear- thanks
Nephythys is offline   Submit to Quotes Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2006, 11:10 AM   #2
Alex
.
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 13,354
Alex is the epitome of coolAlex is the epitome of coolAlex is the epitome of coolAlex is the epitome of coolAlex is the epitome of coolAlex is the epitome of coolAlex is the epitome of coolAlex is the epitome of coolAlex is the epitome of coolAlex is the epitome of coolAlex is the epitome of cool
However, in criticism of the court's opinion I find the First Amendment finding to be spurious. Essentially it says that the wiretapping is a violation of the First Amendment since it has a cooling effect on the willingness of other people to communicate with the plaintiffs.

However, this is true of all wiretaps, whether legal or not. So, if the wiretapping were otherwise ruled legal I don't see how the judge could hold up the First Amendment issue as grounds for injunction. Therefore it seems to me that inclusion of this section is just distracting fluff without any real weight.

I do find the 4th Amendment ruling (that FISA created very specific exceptions to otherwise standard 4th Amendment law and the program under question violates even those looser requirements) very compelling however.
Alex is offline   Submit to Quotes Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2006, 11:32 AM   #3
JWBear
Worn Romantic
 
JWBear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Long Beach California
Posts: 8,435
JWBear is the epitome of coolJWBear is the epitome of coolJWBear is the epitome of coolJWBear is the epitome of coolJWBear is the epitome of coolJWBear is the epitome of coolJWBear is the epitome of coolJWBear is the epitome of coolJWBear is the epitome of coolJWBear is the epitome of coolJWBear is the epitome of cool
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nephythys
...Though I still stand by denial of the stuff posted by JWBear- thanks
Thanks Nephy. That just warms the cockles of my heart.
__________________
Unrestrained frivolity will lead to the downfall of modern society.
JWBear is offline   Submit to Quotes Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:02 PM.


Lunarpages.com Web Hosting

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.